Strong Client Portfolio, Weak Internal Infrastructure - Anonymous employee Komodo Employee Review

1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The agency works with an impressive roster of global brands across beauty, fashion and lifestyle, providing exposure to exciting projects and well-known clients. The team is generally made up of talented, hardworking individuals who are passionate about delivering great work despite the challenges. Lots of international travel opportunities

Cons

Senior leadership can feel insular, with several key decision-makers having long-standing personal relationships that can create a perception of a clique-like culture. At times, informal relationships appear to carry more influence than clearly defined business processes or objective decision-making. There is a significant lack of clarity around roles, responsibilities and ownership across the business. Employees are frequently expected to operate outside their remit, while accountability and decision-making authority remain unclear. Despite hiring experienced senior talent, there is a tendency towards micromanagement and centralised decision-making. This can limit autonomy, slow progress and create frustration for employees who were brought in to lead and drive change. The business has ambitious growth goals, but operational structures, processes and resource planning have not evolved at the same pace with a lack of knowledge of how to. Teams are often expected to absorb increasing workloads without sufficient support, resulting in avoidable pressure and burnout. Strategic direction can shift frequently, making it difficult to align teams around a consistent long-term vision. Priorities regularly change, leading to duplicated effort, inefficiencies and confusion across departments. Communication between senior stakeholders can be fragmented, resulting in mixed messages, conflicting feedback and last-minute changes that impact both employees and clients. The HR/ people function feels disconnected from the day-to-day reality of the business, sitting in an entirely different country. Employee concerns are not always handled with the transparency, consistency or urgency expected, which can leave staff feeling unsupported. There can be a perceived inconsistency in accountability across the business. Concerns raised about senior individuals are not always addressed with the same level of transparency or urgency expected, which can create a sense that certain behaviours are overlooked depending on an individual’s position within the organisation. The agency positions itself as a creative-first business, however there appears to be a lack of investment in senior creative capability and creative leadership. This can create a gap between the ambition of the work being sold and the expertise, structure and resource available to deliver it effectively. Career progression, performance management and development pathways lack transparency, making it difficult for employees to understand how success is measured or what opportunities exist for advancement. Overall, there is a strong focus on growth and new business, but insufficient attention paid to building the leadership structure, operational foundations and employee experience required to support that growth sustainably.

Explore other reviews about Komodo

5.0
Aug 6, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You will have lots of money

Cons

The cons are having to work alot

1.0
Feb 21, 2026
Anonymous contractor
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

you can try the product

Cons

My experience working with Komodo was unfortunately very disappointing. The most concerning issue was delayed payment. I experienced months of nonpayment with little to no proactive communication. Despite multiple texts and emails to leadership, there was no clear timeline, transparency, or accountability. As a creative professional who consistently delivered above scope, this was extremely frustrating and financially stressful. On set, leadership often felt overly micromanaged in ways that did not add value. There was heavy oversight on minor details, but very little meaningful support where it was actually needed. This created inefficiency and tension rather than collaboration. The vibe of direct leadership felt tone-deaf given the delayed payments to creatives. When contractors are putting in double the ask and not being paid on time, it signals a lack of respect for their work. Overall, the organization felt disorganized, with limited structure, unclear processes, and a very junior environment that lacked experienced operational leadership. I would strongly encourage clearer payment systems, stronger communication practices, and more structured on-set leadership to better support the creatives who are driving the work.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All