J&J Isn't the "People" Company It Want's Everyone to Think It Is! - Anonymous employee Johnson & Johnson Employee Review

1.0
Jun 12, 2008
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Generally, stable company, with conservative approach to business. This conservatism maintains stock price and most jobs.

Cons

Total breakdown of performance measurement system means little or no objective feedback; ratings are totally based upon force-ranking all professionals on a bell-curve, meaning that some associates are given lower ratings just because management must have them to meet the distribution curve. Upper management at company levels ensure capital expenditures in the millions are utilized on corporate office renovations, workout gymnasiums at corp. offices, mood rooms for some depts.at corp. offices, when the production facilities can't get a restroom or piece of equipment to replace 20+ yr. old equipment. Generally, upper management knows little at all about the actual operations because they either didn't come from within or they never worked in the actual operations, so they are making very uninformed decisions about the direction of the company. Professionals need to be aware that salary growth will not stay up with inflation due to the very poor merit increases given. Incredibly low capital re-investment into the operations.

Explore other reviews about Johnson & Johnson

5.0
Jun 17, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great work life balance for role

Cons

There can be constant reorgs

3.0
Jun 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The colleagues I worked with were great, friendly, helpful. Because the colleagues were great, I'd love to work there full-time, but this was a short contract.

Cons

The supervisor I was ultimately working for had never worked in digital-related products, in which I had decades of experience. He seemed to be unaware of what every colleague would be telling me (I was interviewing colleagues using a software the manager was intending to propose use for firm-wide). Both the colleagues I interviewed, and the internal technical staff I was speaking with knew the project would not function as he seemed intent on ... forcing(?) it do so. I gave him the resulting report of its users' feedback, and I was finished with my contract. He had gone through 2 other women in this same role, already. And he hired a male after me who delivered esentially the same results. Because I wasn't there, I have no idea of the dream outcome this manager attained, or switched to, later.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All