Pros
1) Getting Jewish holidays off
2) Collaborative teachers, paras, and related service providers
Cons
1) Lack of, underreported, or incorrectly altered documentation regarding student restraints.
2) Staff members are routinely placed in high-risk, volatile situations without adequate protection
3) Micromanagement of teacher communications with parents, which compromises the implementation of necessary safety interventions and harms relationships
3) Administrators exhibit unprofessional behaviors, including swearing, yelling, and a total lack of transparency
4) Discriminatory application of workplace rules and retaliation against staff who raise safety or educational concerns.
5) Chronic understaffing prevents students from receiving a high-quality education or necessary behavioral and emotional support: loss of at least 18 staff members—including teachers, paraprofessionals, and social workers—who were either suddenly fired or resigned on a monthly basis during the 25-26 school year.
6) Frequent, disruptive reassignment of both teachers and students between classrooms, which undermines instructional consistency
7) Absence of a standardized curriculum, structured lesson plans, or clear expectations regarding required instructional materials
8) Employees experience a severe lack of constructive support, mentoring, and professional guidance from direct supervisors.
9) Compensation is significantly lower than that of Chicago Public Schools.
10) The absence of a formal salary schedule prevents financial progression based on experience, licensure, or education level.