Pros
• A handful of decent coworkers who were also trying to survive the dysfunction • That’s about it
Cons
• Abysmal Leadership: Leadership here is a masterclass in how not to run a company. Meetings are constantly disorganized, run over time, and are frequently rescheduled at the last minute without warning or apology. There is zero respect for anyone's time — unless you’re an executive, in which case everyone else is expected to drop everything. • Fake Flexibility: The company loves to parade around the word “flexibility” in every all-hands and job posting, but the reality is completely different. Work-from-home privileges are barely hanging on. The policy says 3–4 WFH days per month, but they track building swipes and pull reports to reprimand anyone who takes more than 3 — so clearly, they don’t trust their employees. It’s performative at best, hypocritical at worst. • Tone-Deaf CEO: The CEO is wildly out of touch with what’s actually happening inside the company. Every communication feels like it’s coming from someone living in an entirely different universe. It’s clear they have no clue how their vague “policies” are affecting employee morale (or they just don’t care). • Misleading Salaries: Job postings include inflated salary ranges to attract applicants, but they’re not actually willing to pay anywhere near the top (or even middle) of those ranges. Compensation discussions feel more like bait-and-switch than negotiation. • DEI Roll-Backs: All diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives were abruptly gutted under the CEO’s direction. Efforts to build an inclusive culture were reversed, sending a loud message: employees from underrepresented backgrounds are not valued. • Toxic Culture in Disguise: On the surface, everything looks nice — but under the hood it’s chaos, micromanagement, and a culture that rewards compliance over competence. Leadership hides behind buzzwords while operating with rigidity.