employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

International Rescue Committee

Is this your company?

Immigration Intern - Intern International Rescue Committee Employee Review

4.0
Jan 5, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A great place to intern at for anyone looking to gain a hands-on experience. Unlike other organizations where interns/volunteers are involved primarily in the administrative work, the IRC heavily relies on their volunteers in all aspects of their work. As an immigration intern, I was directly involved in service delivery, working with refugee-clients on a daily basis. As an intern/volunteer at the IRC, you are treated as a professional equal by staff members and are granted a great amount of responsibilities. While interns are supported by the staff, they are expected to manage their interaction with clients, client case loads, as well as their work approach independently. This is a great opportunity to learn how the organization works from the inside and a great way to get your foot in the door.

Cons

It is a very challenging, fast-paced working environment. Interns often have to adopt a "learn-as-you-go" approach in their work. This experience would be the most beneficial for a pro-active person with a can-do attitude who can make decisions quickly and feels comfortable in ambiguous situations.

Explore other reviews about International Rescue Committee

5.0
Mar 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Had a wonderful time interacting with the students and coworkers. Really appreciate the work of the IRC in supporting migrants.

Cons

No Cons to speak of

2.0
Apr 22, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You will meet some amazing and passionate people here who are truly there for the mission. Many came to this country as refugees and immigrants themselves and continue to devote their lives to helping others going through similar experiences. If you end up on the right team, it's an extremely rewarding job.

Cons

Unfortunately, the HQ upper management makes it a toxic place to work. VPs regularly undercut each other publicly (including at all-team meetings and gossiping negatively with staff), especially when potential job cuts were on the horizon. C-Suite didn't listen to staff concerns about upper management and didn't investigate major departures by dedicated staff who left due to poor management despite their dedication to the mission. Leaders picked favorites, ignoring work performance (excusing mediocre performance in some, having high standards for others), and preferred yes-men over staff who wanted to think more critically about the work. Projects were pushed too quickly, despite concerns that it could be detrimental to clients. Positions given to unqualified internal staff who wouldn't be interviewed for the role as external candidates. Senior leaders (director and above) are more focused on keeping their jobs than the mission and will use lower staff work for their own career growth/safety. DEI didn't seem to apply for senior leader roles, where there was little, if any, diversity.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All