employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Integra LifeSciences

Engaged employer

Manager - Anonymous employee Integra LifeSciences Employee Review

1.0
Jul 10, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not sure other than you get paid every two weeks and you don't have to do very much to have a career here

Cons

Lazy people, and if you try and discipline your lazy and unskilled people then the people above you want your hide. a lot of cut throat activity quality and pride in doing a good job doesn't exist. lots of turn over and very low skill level even in an executive role, skin color helps at review time and will help you keep your job, I wouldn't use the product made here not a chance I was amazed at the below average knowledge and skill level of the leadership here lots of big words very little real knowledge and experience I guess this is why manufacturing make hundreds of parts to get 1 good one and our quality dept. well look at the leaders and you know we don't really understand quality

Explore other reviews about Integra LifeSciences

5.0
Feb 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Salary and commission were great.

Cons

I have nothing negative to say

1.0
May 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

To provide a balanced perspective, one positive aspect was the company's willingness to offer flexible work arrangements.

Cons

I would encourage prospective employees to carefully evaluate the company culture before joining. In my experience, the work environment lacked the level of professionalism and collaborative leadership I expected. Leadership decisions at the senior level often appeared to be driven by personal viewpoints rather than objective discussion and open engagement. Employees who did not align with the preferred direction could experience resistance rather than constructive dialogue. The culture felt more aligned with a "my way or the highway" management style than a collaborative and inclusive approach. I also experienced situations where information communicated about my performance appeared inconsistent with my actual work contributions and outcomes. Rather than constructive feedback supported by objective metrics and open discussion, I felt there were instances where narratives surrounding performance were inaccurate or misrepresented. This created concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and the overall feedback process. The company has also faced regulatory challenges in the past, which may be worth researching independently as part of your due diligence process. My experience ultimately did not align with my expectations for leadership, transparency, and organizational culture.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All