employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Integra LifeSciences

Engaged employer

Currently employed by Integra LifeSciences - Regulatory Affairs Director Integra LifeSciences Employee Review

5.0
Oct 7, 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Challenging and interesting. Certainly this company can be a challenging place to work. However with the challenge comes great interesting projects. If you want mundane and typical, ILS is not the place for you. However, if you want to build your resume with relevant skills like; new product integration as a result of an acquistion, working closely with FDA to develop a regulatory strategy for a product that touches 6 different branches, work on PMA products, meet foreign health authorites like China FDA or Japan PMDA or work for a company that is growing and not shrinking, Integra could be the place for you. Lastly, the best reason to work at Integra are the people.

Cons

Since the company is growing, it experiences the typical growth pains any growing company experiences.

Explore other reviews about Integra LifeSciences

5.0
Feb 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Salary and commission were great.

Cons

I have nothing negative to say

1.0
May 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

To provide a balanced perspective, one positive aspect was the company's willingness to offer flexible work arrangements.

Cons

I would encourage prospective employees to carefully evaluate the company culture before joining. In my experience, the work environment lacked the level of professionalism and collaborative leadership I expected. Leadership decisions at the senior level often appeared to be driven by personal viewpoints rather than objective discussion and open engagement. Employees who did not align with the preferred direction could experience resistance rather than constructive dialogue. The culture felt more aligned with a "my way or the highway" management style than a collaborative and inclusive approach. I also experienced situations where information communicated about my performance appeared inconsistent with my actual work contributions and outcomes. Rather than constructive feedback supported by objective metrics and open discussion, I felt there were instances where narratives surrounding performance were inaccurate or misrepresented. This created concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and the overall feedback process. The company has also faced regulatory challenges in the past, which may be worth researching independently as part of your due diligence process. My experience ultimately did not align with my expectations for leadership, transparency, and organizational culture.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All