employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Integra LifeSciences

Engaged employer

Frustrating Work Environment - Anonymous employee Integra LifeSciences Employee Review

2.0
Apr 6, 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Free Bagel Friday. Ample Parking with plenty of spots.

Cons

Have a good team but culture varies across teams/departments and sometimes people are not treated with respect when mistakes are made Management has to stop pointing fingers and also do some of the work. Their direct reports cannot handle all the work if they are not fairly distributed. Recognition is only possible if you are part of upper management and they are too 'busy' to do that. Small mistakes are widely recognized whereas accomplishments are ignored. Upper Management attend to many meetings where no actions are defined. They sit in meetings all day doing absolutely no actual work. Forget about getting approvals for documents/projects. The managers are too busy in 'meetings' whole day to care about that. No room to grow if you are an entry level. There are no defined paths to tiers. Change of titles is rare. Upper Management do not care about their team career growth, only their own.

Explore other reviews about Integra LifeSciences

5.0
Feb 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Salary and commission were great.

Cons

I have nothing negative to say

1.0
May 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

To provide a balanced perspective, one positive aspect was the company's willingness to offer flexible work arrangements.

Cons

I would encourage prospective employees to carefully evaluate the company culture before joining. In my experience, the work environment lacked the level of professionalism and collaborative leadership I expected. Leadership decisions at the senior level often appeared to be driven by personal viewpoints rather than objective discussion and open engagement. Employees who did not align with the preferred direction could experience resistance rather than constructive dialogue. The culture felt more aligned with a "my way or the highway" management style than a collaborative and inclusive approach. I also experienced situations where information communicated about my performance appeared inconsistent with my actual work contributions and outcomes. Rather than constructive feedback supported by objective metrics and open discussion, I felt there were instances where narratives surrounding performance were inaccurate or misrepresented. This created concerns regarding transparency, accountability, and the overall feedback process. The company has also faced regulatory challenges in the past, which may be worth researching independently as part of your due diligence process. My experience ultimately did not align with my expectations for leadership, transparency, and organizational culture.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All