Great company I have ever worked and My burning desire is go through the same company to my Targets. - Quality Assurance Specialist Innodata Employee Review

5.0
May 11, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- The company is growing so there are opportunities that might not immediately exist. - Our clients are Top rated in the whole world and we are providing our best to them as well as impact the way business is done better across the world. That's is our power. - The company understands the Work-Life balance and We highly respects to the same. - Our company provides and sharing regular/new updates listen to our new ideas and also continuously encouraging growth both professionally and personally. - Simply you can call this company as our Home, since the company allows deep integration into the business and the ability to create pathways to success for others.

Cons

No company is perfect. While we grow there are things that are evolving to the company (for an example: Moving forward with AI, Updating technology, formalizing procedures, etc.).

Explore other reviews about Innodata

5.0
Feb 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great place to work with consistent communication.

Cons

Days can get repetitive and dry

2.0
Apr 12, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some flexibility Work from home

Cons

One thing I really didn’t enjoy about the guidance: our client sets a bench mark of having 85% “utilization”. Basically stating that of the 40 hours worked, 85% of that must be in “production code”, so about 35ish hours a week. The rest of the time can be spent reviewing emails, guidelines, etc. The project manager basically had management tell people that they could be 2.5 hours in other codes, and about 37.5 should be in production. If this is a decision from a client, then great, but it seemed to me the project manager was just trying to get every little bit of production possible out of people. I’m under the impression that if employees are treated like people and given proper breaks, the quality of work will be way better. If you force them to sit for 7.5 hours or a 8 hour day in front of a screen, the quality will be worse. The client says it’s 85% utilization, so why are we telling our employees they need to be in production for 37.5 hours out of the day? It just seems dishonest. Data annotation work can be tough and some of the tasks are repetitive and can take a lot of concentration. Half of the admin, forgets what it’s like to work in the queues, and drive these numbers blindly. Meanwhile, half of their job consists of chatting on teams all day.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All