Pros
> Some teams were high-functioning, with supportive leadership and meaningful client work. > The company has the potential to offer interesting opportunities within federal consulting. > There were ongoing conversations at the time of my departure about improving strategic focus and contract selection.
Cons
> The company operates on a contract-by-contract salary model. If you’re staffed on a lower-margin or underbid contract, you may find limited room for raises—even if you're doing high-value work. Be proactive in understanding the contract you're being hired onto—ask about margin, duration, and strategic priority. > There was no clear structure to normalize salaries across teams, which meant compensation could vary significantly for employees doing similar work. Inquire about the company's plan for professional development and salary growth within your specific team. > In some cases, the company pursued contracts in unfamiliar domains without the internal expertise or infrastructure to support delivery, which put added strain on delivery teams. > The lack of consistent strategic direction in business development sometimes left employees carrying the burden of poorly aligned or under-resourced initiatives. Recognize that experiences vary widely across contracts—some teams are well-supported, others may face challenges due to broader business decisions.