"The Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves" - Managing Director Hunt Institute Employee Review

1.0
Feb 27, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good pay. Good mission. Lots of nice people work here who are just keeping their heads down for fear of retaliation or getting in trouble, probably staying because the pay is good and the exposure to influential people is beneficial and the brand on their resume looks good.

Cons

My short-lived experience at THI was a study in the book, “The Five Dysfunctions of Leadership.” There were red flags during the first interview when the CEO, Javaid, did most of the talking, and shared openly that there were culture issues and dysfunction org-wide. He asserted that he needed a Managing Director who could be loyal like one of his current employees (who was leaving the company). At this point, he referred to her as his “loyal dog.”. Three times, he said he needed another “dog” like her who could be loyal and carry his message. I was so offended and startled by his language that I couldn’t believe my ears! I took this as a really bad sign and withdrew my name from consideration. Javaid called me immediately to say he was so impressed by me and really wished I hadn’t withdrawn. I appreciated his phone call and the nice things he said about me so I decided to give him a second chance and the benefit of the doubt. Throughout the interview process, I shared my values around leadership – creating psychological safety among team members so that true collaboration can occur (a space where diverse opinions are welcome and respectfully challenging the status quo is encouraged); trust as the foundation for great teamwork; and the principles of servant leadership. The senior leadership seemed aligned with those values. I thought I was being hired to bring that kind of mindset to the workplace to help solve the dysfunction and create a more productive, high-performing staff. I was excited about the opportunity to make a difference. During my first week, the dysfunction at THI was on full display. As a former leadership coach and consultant with decades of professional experience, I was incredibly alarmed by the negativity and toxic comments from senior leadership. Multiple people quit, people were getting fired and it was a literal dumpster fire. In my 23 years of experience in the workforce, I’ve never seen anything like it. I saw the CEO multitasking and being distracted during important leadership meetings and dialing in remotely when no one else was allowed to work from home. I think this is hypocritical. They force people to take sick time for days when they need to work from home (for a sick child or when they might be contagious because of a sick spouse). I saw staff keeping their heads down and trying to stay out of the line of fire. I heard people state that there was a lack of safety in the office to speak up. Overall, I witnessed a draconian environment not conducive to high-performing teams. It was obvious there were serious trust issues. The meme comes to mind: “The beatings will continue until morale improves.” I continued to assert that I was optimistic we could shift things and create a better culture. I stated multiple times that “The Hunt Way” of providing exceptional service to external stakeholders should also be a guiding force internally where staff were treated with the same intention. I started my job with the mindset to help create a high-performing culture, but they wanted a policy-enforcer, not a leader and I refused to violate my integrity and values as a leader. I didn’t last long at THI and wouldn’t recommend working here.

Explore other reviews about Hunt Institute

5.0
Nov 19, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mission-Driven Culture: The Hunt Institute’s commitment to improving education is at the center of everything it does. You feel connected to meaningful, impactful work every day. Genuine Non-Partisanship: In a time of heightened polarization, the Institute truly maintains a non-partisan approach. Decisions are guided by research, data, and what best serves students—not politics. Strong Leadership: Deputy's, Directors, Chief of Staff, and CEO are transparent, approachable, and clearly invested in both the mission and vision of Governor Hunt. They communicate priorities well and actively support employee growth. Professional Development Opportunities: Staff are encouraged to learn and take on new responsibilities. You can grow your skills and career quickly. Recently The Institute launched a Leadership Development Cohort designed to support the growth of the next set of rising leaders at the organization and support their development for more responsibilities and promotion. Meaningful External Partnerships: The Institute works closely with policymakers, and stakeholders across the country, making the work feel relevant and exciting. You will have chances to actively work with Lt. Governors, former Governors, state education leaders, and legislators from across the country.

Cons

Some staff bring their personal politics into the workplace, which can create confusion about the Institute’s nonpartisan mission. the Institute can do a better job setting expectations and supporting employees in separating their personal political beliefs from the work so that everyone shows up professionally and aligned with the organization’s role and purpose.

2
1.0
Feb 19, 2026
Anonymous freelancer
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Your coworkers. Somehow this place hired genuinely good people who care about the work and each other. They deserve better.

Cons

The leadership is the problem. The CEO creates instability. Leadership's management style is disorganized and inconsistent, which creates confusion for teams trying to execute work. Strategic priorities shift without explanation. When problems arise, staff receive blame for systemic issues outside their control. The Chief of Staff position was created recently and has not improved organizational function. Communication from senior leadership often lacks professionalism. HR serves leadership interests over employee wellbeing. In one meeting, staff were advised to modify how we dress to avoid sexual harassment—placing responsibility on potential victims rather than addressing inappropriate behavior. HR also made culturally insensitive suggestions for observing Indigenous Peoples Day. The Assembly published reporting in November 2024 documenting "culture of fear" and 100% annual staff turnover. This aligns with my experience. I received positive performance reviews until I questioned a promotion decision made during a stated hiring freeze. Within one week, I was placed on a Performance Improvement Plan. Six weeks later, I was terminated for "performance issues." Financial decision-making lacks transparency. The organization discussed potential layoffs while simultaneously creating new senior positions. Staff questions about budget priorities went unanswered.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All