Marketing Manager - Anonymous employee Hologic Employee Review

2.0
Jul 1, 2015
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They offer a mix of some destructive new technologies (about 20% of the product line) and some very "me too" offerings (about 80% of the product line- extremely mundane). Its that new destructive technology that drove my interest in the company and is also why I accepted the position. They tend to present themselves as a high-end medical device developer, although much of their product development comes from contracted third parties. The internal environment is somewhat anti corporate America, and they envision themselves as the smaller Bone Density company that they were 25 years ago. While externally their messaging attempts to align them with behemoths such as GE, Philips, and Medtronic. They neither align well with these groups nor do they compete effectively, unfortunately they have never been able to make the next step - and should be primed by now for slicing and dicing and some re-organization once again.

Cons

There is the old-hologic (aka: old- boy) network in place, the organization tends to protect the old guard that has been around much too long, getting fat, accomplishing nothing, and living by the mantra - " but we have always done it this way"! New ideas are often shunned, and they absolutely do not want "the new blood" successfully driving sales and revenue. Overall just a very strange work environment and internal attitude, that breeds complacency.

Explore other reviews about Hologic

5.0
Jun 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Friendly people Work life balance is good when it's not busy

Cons

Might not be a good fit for those who are ambitious for their careers

3.0
Jul 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fair Pay, some pretty good teammates

Cons

Worked there a while back and overall Hologic was not much on work-life balance in the IT department. It is often expected to work extra hours during key projects/upgrades, but these projects could go on years or multiple long periods during a year. CIO had a punitive management style who reveled, proudly and vocally, in that role. Any communication to anyone outside of the IT department was also strongly micromanaged by the organization's CIO. This level of micromanagement and very vocal punitive management style all served in an attempt to hide much disorganization and level of noncompetence at that very top-level individual. Under the CIO are some decent directors however, but it was always dismaying to see what these direct reports to the CIO had to deal with. I believe after years it became so normalized to them that they stopped realizing what should be normal.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All