Misleading practices to both employees and clients. - Education Specialist HeyTutor Employee Review

1.0
Oct 10, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The compensation structure was fair, and the flexibility of scheduling they permitted was good, especially for a full-time position.

Cons

For starters, they misrepresented the position from day one. They claimed to be hiring for customer service representatives, and then spent every day I worked there reminding us that our job was not to provide service, it was to make sales and ensure a profit for the company. We were not merely encouraged but flat-out instructed to lie to prospective leads and clients, informing them that we were a "local business" in their hometowns instead of working out of a call center in Los Angeles. Although this practice has since changed, we were also at first told to always say we had in-person tutors available and could provide them no problem (after processing the hefty fee charged, of course), with no knowledge of the actual number of available tutors in a lead's area or if there were any at all. Communication and feedback from management was aggressive and created a culture of fear among employees. "Team meetings" were little more than rants from the CEO. This became even worse with COVID, when schedules were cut to part-time back to full-time back to part-time again with little warning. Layoffs abounded, and management's expectations for those who remained doubled while the actual workforce was more than halved. Concerns about the business's future were not taken seriously and blamed on a lack of "hustle" on employees' parts.

Explore other reviews about HeyTutor

5.0
Feb 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good management, good work/life balance, good company values/mission

Cons

Very few cons, great company

4.0
Dec 22, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I’ve seen the company evolve significantly over time, and the current version feels far more intentional than it once was. Under new leadership, there’s clearer direction, better prioritization, and a noticeable shift toward follow-through and accountability. It’s still a scrappy EdTech environment, but now with stronger systems, clearer ownership, and a leadership team that is actively learning from past missteps rather than repeating them. The expectations are high, but support exists. People are trusted to do their jobs, and expertise is respected—especially if you’re thoughtful, prepared, and willing to take ownership. There’s real autonomy here, not just in theory. When you raise concerns or push back with rationale, it’s taken seriously. That wasn’t always the case, and the change matters. The work itself is meaningful. The pace is fast and the workload can be heavy, but the impact is tangible, especially if you care about students, educators, and doing the work “the right way” rather than just quickly. For mid-level ICs and managers who like building, problem-solving, and shaping processes (not just maintaining them), this can be a very fulfilling place to work.

Cons

This is not a slow or easy environment. Priorities can still shift, and ambiguity comes with the territory of a growing company. You’ll need to be comfortable operating without perfect information or 'tried and true' processes, as well as managing competing demands. While things are far more structured than they used to be, there are still moments where bandwidth is stretched and timelines are ambitious, but this is also improving. If you’re looking for a rigid 9–5 or highly siloed role, this likely isn’t the right fit. The pace may feel intense at times, but the new collaboration is great and we're doing meaningful work that is now recognized.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All