People at the top who remain must be closely examined - Anonymous employee Helix Employee Review

1.0
Aug 23, 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Time to look at the remaining executive team

Cons

Leaders by title? Or are executive level titles backed by merit and accomplishments?

avatar
Helix Response
6y
Thank you kindly for your feedback and advice. I’m saddened that you left with this perception of Helix and our management team, and would have loved the opportunity to chat directly prior to your departure. I would have been happy to share with you my own perspectives on the company’s journey, which, as I’m sure you know, I have been close to since inception. We started with the mission to empower every person to improve their life through DNA. Like most start-ups, Helix had a business model which was unique, and needed to be proven out. Over time, it became clear to all of us (the company, board and investors) that following the highly successful Healthy Nevada Project (HNP) with our partner Renown, the most effective way to achieve our mission would be to focus on more opportunities like HNP. The work done to date at Helix enabled that focus, by creating some unique assets that are now key components of our Population Health Solution. I’m appreciative of the work done by everyone at Helix, including the senior members of our team, to create the company that we are today, and to enable us to make the changes we needed to make as quickly and effectively as we did so that we could focus on the opportunities that we have ahead of us with a solid, stable foundation. I’m excited to move forward with this team to deliver on our mission. - Marc

Explore other reviews about Helix

5.0
Feb 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Dynamic fast modern company with lots of opportunities to learn modern tools.

Cons

Modern fast companies often require occasional uncompensated overtime and rapid changing priorities

1.0
Nov 2, 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The industry the company is in has potential.

Cons

After a decade, many basic processes are still not standardized. Simple tasks that should be easy elsewhere take unnecessary effort here. Mid-level managers form cliques, handling conflicts by forcing the more reasonable side to back down. Double standards are everywhere. People who don’t do the work tend to oppress those who do. Managers have a shallow understanding of both the work and people, resorting to bullying those who are kind while avoiding confrontations with the strong or rude. There's a constant manpower shortage, and higher-level issues are often dumped on lower-level employees, but salaries and promotions don’t reflect this. Meetings are mostly for show—employees are only allowed to ask trivial questions or praise each other. If you bring up real issues, they’ll either ask you to fix them yourself or tell you to stay quiet. Layoffs have been frequent over the past year, mostly targeting decent employees who won’t cause trouble or those who dare to speak up. The company is rigidly hierarchical, both in title and race. Middle managers give speeches as if they’re important figures, which is laughable. The quality of employees has dropped, and management is full of holes. Issues in old negative Glassdoor reviews remain unresolved to this day. The tolerance for toxic employees and the chaotic management have left good employees discouraged—they either find excuses to leave or simply cut down their productivity. As one one-star review said, this company needs a complete overhaul, not just minor tweaks.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All