Health Catalyst lives up to its promises as an employer - Data Architect Health Catalyst Employee Review

5.0
Mar 16, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Most places I've worked say stuff about trying to promote a positive team environment and all those buzz words about good workplaces. But Health Catalyst is the only place I've worked where the environment turned out to be exactly as I was told: I've had opportunities to work with people from all parts of the company and each of these has been positive. People are eager to collaborate to help each other. People respond quickly and work together as efficiently and positively as they can. I think the key is that everyone seems to truly believe in the company's goal to transform healthcare.

Cons

The breakroom is stocked with free sodas and insane amounts of snacks. Apparently some people gain weight because of this. BUT, on the plus side, there are also healthy snacks like hummus and carrots. To help you lose the weight you gain from all the chocolate-covered almonds and Mountain Dews. I guess.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
11y
I agree that training is important, and we are working to actively tighten the learning curve for new hires. As you well know, we are adding clients so quickly right now we need to find ways to hire, train, and grow amazing new team members.

Explore other reviews about Health Catalyst

5.0
Jan 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote work, good pay, wonderful people

Cons

The company grew too big too fast and has been trying to downsize erratically

3.0
May 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great Talent & Culture: The people here are highly capable, collaborative, and committed to helping each other succeed. The partnership between onshore and offshore teams works well and is a real strength. There’s a culture of grit and stability that has helped the company navigate multiple major transitions over the years. Mission-Critical Engineering: The work involves complex data infrastructure that requires deep technical expertise. It can be demanding, but seeing these systems run successfully and support real-world operations is consistently rewarding.

Cons

Wage Compression and Retention Risk: Compensation for tenured and high-performing staff has not kept pace with the market for specialized data engineering and support leadership. In practice, tenure can feel undervalued or even penalized. This creates risk around losing institutional knowledge and operational continuity. Stagnant Career Progression: Contrary to stated expectations, strong performance ratings do not consistently translate into meaningful, market-aligned compensation growth. The process of how compensation is benchmarked lacks clarity in practice, obscuring how compensation decisions are made and what is required to advance.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All