Proactive - Senior Software Engineer Health Catalyst Employee Review

5.0
Jan 7, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The leadership is committed to the well-being of its employees and the benefits are pretty good overall (they're serious about "unlimited PTO" or whatever it has been rebranded to these days). My experience with management has been that they're proactive, seeking to offer the best it can upfront rather than waiting for disgruntled employees to motivate them into reacting. They're also attentive to the need to change strategies or tactics when they believe that they're wrong or find their plans less effective. Humility is promoted and everyone is encouraged to make data-informed decisions. I'm impressed with how well the leadership navigates personal and/or political issues that come up during company meetings. They're honest, transparent, and say it like it is while still respecting the diverse opinions of the company's demographics. They're willing to make hard decisions, even unpopular ones, rather than just avoiding them. They practice what they preach, sharing seats in the figurative rollercoaster, wherever it might go.

Cons

Unsurprisingly—given the recent 2020 market—many benefits have been getting redefined, reduced, or cut altogether. Conversely, new benefits are occasionally being added, but most of them only present niche value. Trying to make data-informed decisions means lots of surveys, which I've started to ignore to my detriment. For some of the less official ones, giving qualified feedback occasionally provokes check-box conversations with immediate management. As far as I know, these have never backfired—I just dislike hollow conversations. Obtaining the insurance discount each quarter is another check-box. The wellness challenges are certainly creative and probably have a lot of data to back them, but I'm generally more interested in the goals that I set for myself and they rarely allow me to double-dip anymore. I've opted out of that discount more than once.

avatar
Health Catalyst Response
5y
Thank you for this articulate, well-thought-through, detailed and insightful review. And thank you for your support and for sharing the positives that you've experienced in a critical role like yours -- Senior Software Engineer. I appreciated your perspective of the quarterly health insurance discount through participation in a health-related goal. I just texted our Chief People Officer, Linda Llewelyn, to consider whether we potentially change the structure of the quarterly health goals to enable more autonomy and self-selection of goals for each individual. I also appreciate your perspective of commitment to the company and its mission even when times are tough. Thank you again for this insightful review. Best, Dan

Explore other reviews about Health Catalyst

5.0
Jan 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote work, good pay, wonderful people

Cons

The company grew too big too fast and has been trying to downsize erratically

3.0
May 5, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great Talent & Culture: The people here are highly capable, collaborative, and committed to helping each other succeed. The partnership between onshore and offshore teams works well and is a real strength. There’s a culture of grit and stability that has helped the company navigate multiple major transitions over the years. Mission-Critical Engineering: The work involves complex data infrastructure that requires deep technical expertise. It can be demanding, but seeing these systems run successfully and support real-world operations is consistently rewarding.

Cons

Wage Compression and Retention Risk: Compensation for tenured and high-performing staff has not kept pace with the market for specialized data engineering and support leadership. In practice, tenure can feel undervalued or even penalized. This creates risk around losing institutional knowledge and operational continuity. Stagnant Career Progression: Contrary to stated expectations, strong performance ratings do not consistently translate into meaningful, market-aligned compensation growth. The process of how compensation is benchmarked lacks clarity in practice, obscuring how compensation decisions are made and what is required to advance.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All