employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Harvard University

Is this your company?

Not as cool as you would think - Anonymous employee Harvard University Employee Review

2.0
May 24, 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good benefits. 35 hour work week. Plenty of holidays off.

Cons

I worked with a lot of people who really weren't on their game. Their skills weren't that great and their aspirations weren't that high. Some were downright cruel. I saw a lot of managers and non-managers who behaved in petty, arbitrary and unimaginative ways. The information systems and processes that I saw were less developed than those I had seen in smaller "no-name" businesses. I guess the overall message is don't assume you will be working with people who behave in professional and nice ways with excellent skills just because you are working at "Harvard" - a lot of what I saw happening there was quite dumb.

Explore other reviews about Harvard University

5.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

A PhD is always very advisor/PI dependent, but I had a great experience with room to learn, grow, and explore interesting research questions. As with any PhD program you’ll work pretty hard for relatively lower pay and perhaps less directly applicable industry career trajectory at the end, but if you find good people to tackle the journey with and get to work on interesting problems I personally think the journey is worthwhile!

Cons

Less of a program wide cohort in my particular engineering field. Some funding challenges with the govt last year but seem mostly back now, apart from the recent administration issues funding wasn’t generally a challenge

5.0
Jun 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You work with experts from every field possible in science from Mechanobiology to Metallurgy and working as a ML intern along with scientists from different fields gave me a lot of exposure and how to work in a research department.

Cons

One challenge encountered was maintaining a clear focus on training objectives, as the evolving parameters required continuous reassessment of the model's learning priorities. Additionally, the absence of established ground truth for the domain presented a limitation in validating and guiding the approach effectively.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All