OUTSTANDING COMPANY THAT I DID NOT APPRECIATE UNTIL TOO LATE - Former Manager Hamister Group Employee Review

5.0
Feb 7, 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

This Company starting with its CEO and COO sets high standards especially regarding an exceptional customer experience and a rigid value system of honesty and ethics. This initially attracted me as something that I wanted. I was more accustomed to a lower standard of performance. I found that while such high standards were exciting and attractive it meant I needed to be sharper, work harder and smarter. I was not smart enough to appreciate it at the time. I left. I went to an environment with lower expectations. I do not feel as accomplished as I did when I worked for Hamister. I now miss it. I miss being challenged. If you want to be among the best, join them and do not make the mistake that I made. The grass is not greener.

Cons

They tend to hold onto people who do not subscribe to their higher standards and then let them complain and bad mouth. I hope that they learn to not keep those weaker people who are always blaming others instead of looking in the mirror.

Explore other reviews about Hamister Group

5.0
Dec 27, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

People, growth, opportunity, location, Work From Home opportunities

Cons

Always some cons for different people but good out weighs the bad

1.0
Oct 6, 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

• Competitive Salaries for GMs: Hamister Group offers competitive compensation packages for General Managers.

Cons

1. Incompetent Area Managers: The leadership from the Area Managers is notably lacking, providing little to no effective support or guidance to the hotel properties. This incompetence results in a lack of strategic direction, leaving General Managers to navigate complex problems without proper oversight or assistance. 2. Nepotism and Inexperienced Leadership: The CEO, having inherited the company, demonstrates a clear lack of expertise in managing hotel operations. This has resulted in decisions that reflect more self-interest and entitlement than sound business strategy. His use of position and authority to bully new management only exacerbates the challenges faced by the properties. 3. No Accountability for Historical Failings: New management teams are forced to clean up years of neglect and mismanagement, including corruption and illegal activities. Despite these systemic issues, there is a conspicuous lack of accountability within the company, as the CEO and executive team fail to address the root causes or implement corrective measures. 4. Incompetent Asset Department: The Asset department shows a glaring deficiency in its role, often making poor decisions that negatively impact the properties’ financial and operational performance. Their oversight fails to address ongoing issues, which continue to degrade property value and guest satisfaction. 5. Poorly Executed Renovation Projects: The company’s habit of hiring substandard renovation firms leads to subpar property improvement projects. These renovations not only fail to meet brand standards but also result in excessive downtime and operational disruptions, further contributing to the properties’ declining reputation and performance. 6. Lack of Support for Failing Properties: Properties inherited by new General Managers often come with a backlog of problems, including operational, financial, and compliance failures. Rather than providing the necessary support to turn these properties around, upper management tends to blame new employees, creating a toxic work environment and unrealistic expectations.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All