If you have a degree and/or a teaching license DO NOT APPLY! - Anonymous employee Goal Academy Employee Review

1.0
Aug 18, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The students are the best and only reason to work here. Concurrent enrollment is a great opportunity for the students. Employment at GOAL Academy is only slightly better than working at Taco Bell, so if that is the only alternative, it might be considered a good place to work.

Cons

The majority of staff in leadership are not qualified to run a school. Nepotism abounds. Most of the employees working with students do not have an educational background and have poor boundaries with kids, spending their day stalking students' Facebook accounts and using Facebook and text as the primary form of communication. Less than 20% of students pass their classes at GOAL. Students will fail year after year, enroll again in the Fall to increase numbers for "count", shortly thereafter "exited" when they don't check in with staff on a regular basis. Principals and APs focus their time and energy on passer rates and attendance but not so much about learning outcomes. Plagiarism runs rampant with most turning a blind eye. Teachers do not have the flexibility to do their jobs well. Licensed teachers and counselors are treated poorly causing a high level of turnover among the highly qualified staff. The ones who stay typically could not get a job in any other type of educational setting due to lack of credentials.

Explore other reviews about Goal Academy

5.0
Jan 26, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It was a great job that had a great balance between working from home and working in person with great people and students

Cons

I had no cons with the job or organizations. I only left because we were moving states.

1.0
May 2, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

High Integrity Professionals: I was surrounded by amazing colleagues who provided a strong sense of camaraderie and support despite the environment.

Cons

Abrupt restructuring and lack of leadership transparency Impersonal Terminations and Role Devaluation: Leadership executed abrupt, "no-notice" layoffs of tenured staff via Teams meetings. The subsequent posting of nearly identical positions with new titles indicates that the move was focused on reducing payroll rather than genuine restructuring, showing a clear disregard for employee tenure. ​Institutional Protection of Toxicity: A senior member of management remains on staff, despite formal investigations and reports of employee mistreatment, indicating a lack of accountability at the executive level. ​Cultural Erosion: The disregard for staff well-being and the lack of compassion during exits has caused significant damage to the internal culture.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All