Poor leadership and culture - GTM Glean (CA) Employee Review

1.0
Nov 22, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some very talented people here

Cons

From my experience, the company suffers from inexperienced leadership that struggles to run a proper GTM organisation. Promotions appeared to be driven by personal alliances rather than performance. High employee turnover, under-resourced teams, and constant budget pressure made it extremely difficult to operate effectively. The culture is unstable and far from what’s advertised.

Explore other reviews about Glean (CA)

5.0
Jun 17, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. Fun and impactful product to work on. 2. Business growing exponentially. Marquee customer base. 3. Lots to learn.

Cons

1. AI space is getting noisy. If you can't compete, this is not the industry to be in.

1.0
Mar 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pros: Office snacks, work location, and friendly coworkers. The SE organization also has strong hiring managers. There can be some lack of direction and occasional chaos, which may be expected at a Series F stage company.

Cons

Cons: • Lack of structure and clear processes for KPIs, with decision-making at times feeling influenced by internal politics. • In my experience, leadership within the GTM organization appeared relatively inexperienced, which created challenges in execution and alignment. • Promotions at times seemed influenced by relationships rather than purely performance-based outcomes. • High employee turnover, under-resourced teams, and ongoing budget constraints made it difficult to operate effectively. • Career progression and role expectations could feel inconsistent, with rapid title changes not always aligned with experience. • Remote and in-office expectations felt misaligned, particularly across different office locations, leading to confusion around the purpose of in-person attendance. • Workplace morale could be low, with employees feeling the need to be overly cautious in communication and feedback. • Feedback and communication styles were not always received consistently across team members, which may have impacted inclusivity and openness. • Success could feel highly dependent on manager relationships, regardless of individual performance or hiring outcomes. • Limited clarity around ownership and collaboration among recruiters, including candidate and role ownership, which sometimes led to overlapping efforts without clear credit or accountability.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All