Pros
Good snacks and drinks provided
Company lunches
Solid friendships formed
Cons
Gateway Fiber talked a lot about work-life balance, but in practice it often felt very different. Many employees were stretched thin, working long hours and constantly feeling drained. The expectation to keep pushing even when workloads were overwhelming made it difficult to maintain any real balance. The messaging sounded good on paper, but the day-to-day experience didn't reflect those values.
Since the merger, there was a noticeable lack of accountability among leadership. Problems often went unaddressed, communication was inconsistent, and responsibility tended to get passed around instead of owned. Leadership increasingly felt like a "good ole boys" club, where certain voices carried more weight than others and decisions didn't always feel objective or transparent.
There were attempts at "culture improvement," such as requiring teams to read leadership or self-improvement books, but these efforts felt disconnected from the real issues. Assigning reading didn't drive meaningful change or improve the actual quality of work when core structural and leadership problems remained unresolved.
The workplace culture often felt immature and unprofessional — more like a high school or reality-TV-style environment than a serious organization. Cliques, gossip, and internal drama made it difficult to focus on doing your job well. It was also an environment where many employees felt like they were constantly on thin ice, which created stress and discouraged open communication or honest feedback.
There were good people at Gateway Fiber, plus there still are, who genuinely care about their work and customers, but the company would have benefited from stronger leadership accountability, more realistic expectations, and a more professional, supportive culture that truly aligned with the values it promoted.