employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Freedom Financial Network

Is this your company?

Good company but needs Improvements - Freedom Debt Relief Freedom Financial Network Employee Review

3.0
Jun 7, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I spent all of years with this company and had a really great experience with the culture, environment, and leadership.

Cons

The company lacked professional growth, I found it nearly impossible to get promoted and move up within the company.

Explore other reviews about Freedom Financial Network

5.0
Jan 2, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Positive work environment Great food in cafe Challenging yet engaging work

Cons

Not really a downside, sometimes it's difficult to help newer creditors adjust to compliance with regulatory processes

3.0
Jan 28, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fully remote. The company has remained remote post-COVID, offering flexibility and eliminating commute time. Strong coworker support. Your colleagues will be your lifeline in this line of work. The team environment is genuinely supportive, which is critical given the nature of the job. Good work/life balance. Most teams work Monday through Friday during normal business hours, and most major holidays are observed. The schedule is predictable and allows for personal time. Solid resume builder. If you can handle the challenges of debt settlement work, the experience you gain here is valuable and will strengthen your resume significantly. The skills are transferable to other customer service roles and in the finance industry. Effective onboarding and training. I can't speak to the debt consultant training specifically, but the customer service onboarding was clear, well-structured, and prepared me for the role as much as reasonably possible given the nature of the work.

Cons

Compensation below industry standard. Pay is low relative to the workload, and merit increases are minimal even for top performers, typically not reflective of the additional responsibilities agents take on. Increasing workload without proportional compensation. Since 2024, the company has adopted a "lean and mean" approach, requiring agents to handle multiple products and expanded responsibilities for the same pay. Frequent management turnover. Leadership changes happen often, and these shifts tend to impact front-line employees the most, with policies and expectations changing regularly. Profitability doesn't translate to employee compensation. Despite the debt settlement industry being highly profitable (multi-billion dollar sector), financial success hasn't resulted in meaningful pay improvements for ground-level staff. Career development is improving but still challenging for front-line agents. The company is making efforts to create clearer career paths, which is appreciated, but the current approach still falls short. Agents are expected to learn and develop largely on their own time while managing back-to-back calls in a high-stress contact center environment. In contrast, supervisors and managers receive structured classroom training and dedicated development time. While the intent to improve is there, the execution leaves front-line staff at a disadvantage. Emotionally challenging client base. Debt settlement is a divisive product with significant drawbacks for consumers. Clients are often in financial hardship, frustrated, and dissatisfied with the program itself. Additionally, consumers are more educated than ever about debt settlement services, including the risks and controversies surrounding the industry. This means you'll frequently encounter skeptical, informed clients who may question the program's value or express distrust. This creates a consistently difficult customer service environment where managing expectations and de-escalating conflict are daily requirements. Do your research on the debt settlement industry before applying. Understanding the product, its limitations, and common consumer criticisms is critical to managing stress and setting realistic expectations for the role. Heavy reliance on AI without addressing workload concerns. Leadership appears to misunderstand the limitations of AI tools (LLMs). While AI can assist with certain tasks, it's being used as justification to increase agent workload rather than improve efficiency or reduce stress. The tools don't compensate for high call volume or the complexity of distressed customer interactions, and this approach risks significant burnout.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All