As per the title, there's a lot of great talent at the company who joined for what was once a fantastic and authentic culture. Employee perks are good, and in joining as a grad or at a mid-level you'd have excellent and supportive colleagues. Lovely office space.
Cons
Opaque and unfair pay, high workload. MD is regularly witnessed making snide personal comments about employees and throwing tantrums. Other management seem more human but powerless to effect any positive change.
ForrestBrown Response
2y
Thank you for your feedback. Whilst we don’t feel this review paints a fair or accurate picture of life at ForrestBrown, we continue to encourage and value feedback. ForrestBrown prides itself on its ability to adapt, evolve and maintain our culture of collaboration, determination, excellence, generosity and trust.
• Strong brand in the R&D tax space, which opens doors and creates opportunities.
• Technical delivery team has great tax knowledge – advice is focused on legislative compliance unlike many firms in the space.
• Structured onboarding and initial training provided a good tax technical foundation of knowledge.
• Office environment is great and colleagues were very supportive at a peer level.
• There is generally a good sense of camaraderie amongst the BD team and support functions.
Cons
• Support for sales staff is limited: Once onboarding is complete, you're largely left to navigate what is a complex landscape with minimal strategic support.
• Progression opportunities are unclear: Despite early promises, career progression was slow and opaque. Clear paths were often hinted at but rarely materialised.
• Regular changes to commission structure: Agreed pay structures were adjusted multiple times with little warning, which made it very difficult to trust long-term earning potential or plan ahead.
• Top-down decision-making: Leadership tends to take a rigid, numbers-first approach that overlooks the on-the-ground realities of business development.
• Recognition is inconsistent: Strong performance isn’t always rewarded fairly or consistently, and bottom up feedback from high performers was rarely considered for process improvement.