Used to be great but it's getting bad. - Software Engineer FloQast Employee Review

2.0
Aug 22, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- The FloQast that hired me was an amazing company. The culture was friendly and low stress. - The benefits are pretty good. The health insurance is great and the mental health days are nice. - The engineers are amazing and great people. I have not worked with a single one that I didn't like. - There are lots of great EMs that actually care about their engineers.

Cons

- New management has rapidly changed the culture for the worse. During the re-organization, the SVP of engineering explicitly called for working on weekends and stated that the new changes would "cause a lot of anxiety and stress." HR went along with this and talked about coming up with an exit strategy if this didn't align with our values. Appalling. - The engineering organization has restructured multiple times this year and things feel aimless because of it. - Management has created ways to quickly push out features that customers want or prospective customers need before they sign. These require constant pivoting and are rushed without the ability for good testing. Our defect rate has risen substantially and I spend more time fixing defects than I ever have before. - Work-life balance used to be great but I am consistently working 10+ hour days and taking less PTO. - They pushed hard to dismantle a monolithic repo but abandoned it halfway through to focus on revenue. Instead there is a disastrous mixture of MFEs and microservices that call the monolith repo. This is going to be a big problem in the future.

Explore other reviews about FloQast

5.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great management and Learning structure

Cons

A lot of internal meetings and can be strict on in-office

1.0
Apr 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Genuinely strong benefits. 12-week paternity leave is real and appreciated. The people I worked with directly were hardworking and talented. That's about where the positives end.

Cons

The CTO is systematically dismantling engineering, and senior leadership is either complicit or asleep. The work-life balance that once made this company a genuine differentiator is gone. Daily production incidents are now normalized — a direct consequence of gutting the QA team through a series of layoffs, forced exits, and outsourcing. The offshoring initiative has been a particular disaster for work-life balance. Engineers were told offshore teams would work around US schedules. That was not true. Expect pings on Saturday and Sunday. Expect late-night messages. The CTO himself will DM you on a Sunday for something that could have waited until Monday. The RTO situation is being handled with zero transparency. If you're within a two-hour radius of a California office, you're being quietly pressured to come in — but this has only been communicated to California employees. No formal announcement. No company-wide policy. Just quiet pressure. The CTO's hiring practices deserve scrutiny. A pattern of loyalty hires has brought chaos and stress into engineering. Whether these hires were rigorously vetted is a fair question. What's not in question is the impact: added instability, a culture of working nights and weekends, and an implicit expectation that everyone else does the same. Anonymous Q&As — once a meaningful feedback channel — were eliminated when the company removed anonymity. No one asks questions anymore. Funny how that works. The long-tenured, high-performing engineers who were FloQast have left in droves since the new CTO arrived. The institutional knowledge is gone. The culture is gone. The company I joined no longer exists.

22
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All