Don’t fall in a trap by accepting this Company - AutoCAD Technician Ferrovial Employee Review

1.0
Mar 1, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

No positive feedback for this company

Cons

I express my deep concern and disappointment regarding the unexpected termination of my contract with Ferrovial/Riverlinx CJV, which will occurred on friday 22nd December, after just a week and a half of my employment. During my brief tenure at Riverlinx CJV, I have diligently endeavored to integrate into the team and contribute to the projects assigned to me. However, the circumstances leading to my termination have left me perplexed. Despite these hurdles, I made every effort to resolve the issues promptly and contribute to the tasks assigned to me. This abrupt termination has left me deeply distressed, confused and made me sick for the week, as I was eager to continue contributing to the projects and learning from my colleagues. I believe that a termination without clear communication or proper evaluation of my performance is unfair and does not align with the principles of professional conduct. I will not suggest anyone to leave their current job and join at Ferrovial/Riverlinx CJV

Explore other reviews about Ferrovial

5.0
Feb 24, 2026
Anonymous intern
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Scholarship, good guidance and good expirience.

Cons

I did not have time to have anything negative about the company.

2.0
Mar 12, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company is profitable, has stable revenue streams and is committed to fiscal sustainability. They’ve adjusted compensation ranges and are now above market for most IA roles. Benefits are average. Although long hours are the norm during the week, weekend work is rare. 401k Match vests immediately Potential to work with global teams and in Europe.

Cons

The internal audit group lacks the maturity and expertise needed to provide meaningful insights at an organization of this size and complexity. Most work is advisory and leans heavily on internally developed criteria which makes it difficult for experienced hires to adjust. Work is chaotic and unorganized and there are not sufficient IT resources and tools to effectively document SOX work . IA leadership is centralized in Spain and has no interest in collaboration with teams outside of Madrid. It’s a command and control structure, and even experienced hires are micromanaged. There is a general lack of respect, and lack of professionalism in the way that Internal Audit in Madrid interacts with US based employees (both within IA and with external stakeholders). This results in a very blame-based and distrustful culture where a lot of emphasis is placed on making the work done in Spain seem higher quality or more impactful. All executive level reporting is in Spain, in Spanish so US based employees don’t have executive visibility which limits career potential. Leaders are not invested in the professional growth of their employees. There is no formal feedback structure, and no formal feedback outside of the annual review. It’s not common for employees to have certifications and annual dues are not reimbursed.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All