Just, no - Anonymous employee Everly Health Employee Review

1.0
Feb 27, 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I’m at a loss for words

Cons

The favoritism was nothing I had ever seen. One minute someone would be on the chopping block, only for a different manager to take over and dote on that employee making it extremely uncomfortable for the team. It was hard to know who to trust and if “leadership”’truly cared about the company and its employees or just themselves. There is also a constant push-and-pull between the consumer and enterprise sides of the company. The one-sided knowledge among the c-suite makes for poor operating decisions and even disrespectful conversations. Lastly, if you’re looking for a company that really makes a social impact, you’re better off somewhere else. The products are not solutions, they are simply products. Clinical team members will tell you otherwise because they have zero experience in population health and think that a few positive user testimonials are what makes the company unique and solution oriented.

Explore other reviews about Everly Health

5.0
Apr 14, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Supportive, forward facing management and leadership. They are truly involved in the process. This is a fast moving environment, where you are given the chance to expose yourself to new roles and duties every day. Hard work and dedication are noticed here, with annual compensation reviews. What you put into this environment, you will get out of it. Benefits are truly game changing. Many medical milestones in my life here, and I have never had to worry about the bill at the end of the day. This is something I can't say for many other employers at which I've worked.

Cons

I am content here. I can't think of any.

1.0
Apr 1, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not that i can think of.

Cons

Compensation remains low relative to workload and has not been adjusted despite ongoing feedback from employees. Workload did not align with staffing levels, leading to overstaffing and periods of inefficiency. The role operates in a highly transactional manner, where employees are treated as interchangeable resources rather than long-term contributors. Management communication lacked transparency, and feedback was not communicated directly to employees. There was no structured training process, limiting the ability to understand expectations or improve performance. Employment stability is limited, with sudden terminations occurring without prior notice when workload decreases.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All