employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Envista Forensics

Part of Cor Partners

Is this your company?

Poor Management Decisions - Senior Project Engineer Envista Forensics Employee Review

2.0
Sep 6, 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Although the pros are becoming few and far between, the merger with LWG has been less than exciting. Prior to this merger, we were managed well with little in our way to keep us from providing excellent services. Bonus pay was good with hard work, which has decreased over time, local work is nice, less travel outside your area.

Cons

Management has decided to follow the LWG way of things, last minute travel to high profile jobs to satisfy the egos of the CEO and his upper management buddies. Promotions are a joke if you are an engineer, little pay increase for increased job responsibilities. The focus has been more on getting trained engineers to become sales staff, rewarding marketing meetings while good work on actual engineering jobs goes un-noticed. Work from home has been going by the wayside, only now hiring individuals that are willing to sit at a desk at some other location.

Explore other reviews about Envista Forensics

5.0
May 21, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Strong leadership and growth opportunities. You get to work with smart, hard working people who care about each other and the success of the business. Teams work together collaboratively, communicate well. Changes and investments are made with discernment to get teams the resources they need to be successful. Overall a great place to work.

Cons

No cons to share right now.

2.0
Mar 17, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Strong brand recognition in the forensic engineering and consulting space. Exposure to a wide variety of project types across industries. Access to knowledgeable technical experts with deep subject matter expertise. Flexible work environment depending on role and team. Ongoing investment in systems and tools aimed at improving reporting and visibility (though still maturing).

Cons

Operational execution consistently lags behind strategic vision, resulting in ongoing confusion and inefficiencies. A company-wide operational change to email routing for the PC team was announced shortly before the holidays, partially reversed within days, and has still not received clear follow-up or final direction months later—highlighting gaps in planning, communication, and accountability. Major initiatives are frequently implemented without adequate pilot testing or stakeholder alignment, leading to rework and disruption. Communication gaps between leadership and execution teams create inconsistent messaging and misaligned expectations. Frequent process changes mid-rollout create unnecessary friction for employees and external partners. Lack of clear ownership and accountability in cross-functional initiatives slows progress and reduces effectiveness. Systems and processes remain fragmented and underdeveloped, making it difficult to operate efficiently at scale.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All