employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Energy Transfer

Is this your company?

Snakes in the grass - Operations Manager Energy Transfer Employee Review

1.0
Feb 7, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good pay, bonus, and benefits.

Cons

This company operates on deception, favoritism, and quiet retaliation. What leadership says to your face often has nothing to do with what happens behind closed doors. Promises are made casually and broken just as easily, usually without explanation or accountability. Management thrives on politics instead of performance. If you don’t play along, flatter the right people, or stay silent when you see problems, you will be sidelined. Hard work is rewarded with more work, while poor performers with the right connections are protected and promoted. Communication is intentionally vague, expectations change without notice, and employees are blamed for failures caused by bad leadership decisions. Morale is consistently low because trust does not exist here—everyone learns quickly to watch their back. This is not a professional environment; it’s a survival game. If you value integrity, transparency, or leadership with a backbone, look elsewhere.

Explore other reviews about Energy Transfer

5.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great company, benefits, bonuses, PTO, all the things!

Cons

I don't like that they don't post salary ranges or target salaries for employee to know what the range is they should be in.

3.0
Feb 3, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Energy Transfer is a larger company with good benefits.

Cons

While the company offers several strengths, there are notable challenges that impact overall effectiveness and employee experience. The physical and operational separation between the corporate office in Dallas and the hub office in Houston creates an environment where local leadership in Houston can operate with limited oversight. This dynamic often results in inconsistent management practices and a sense that individual departments function as independent silos rather than as part of a unified organization. Additionally, a significant portion of the workforce has been with the company for many years. While institutional knowledge is valuable, this longevity has also contributed to resistance toward adopting modern best practices. Long‑standing routines frequently take precedence over more efficient or updated processes, making it difficult to drive meaningful improvement or innovation. Together, these factors can hinder collaboration, slow organizational progress, and create frustration for employees who are eager to see the company evolve.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All