Was Better, now a Outsourcing Central - Engineer Emerson Employee Review

4.0
Jan 7, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Stable, if you're direct-hire you're more or less secure even in the down term; Has a really good group of knowledge people to work with

Cons

This review is for the Gulf Coast Engineering Center in Houston. Years ago Emerson was still quite good at investing in engineers, send them to school to learn about the very product they'd use (DeltaV); not any more as most projects these days are 70-80% hours allocated to offshore engineering centers (India, Costa Rica..etc). This is bad because most Houston engineers (except few) no longer know the real "know-how" and only have the supervisory roles in terms of making sure projects are on time, within budget, and control project scope changes with clients. If you want to learn DeltaV, this is not the place for you. Better place would be smaller system integrators that actually do the configuration (programming) work within US. This may be just reality as outsourcing is the norm not just within Emerson, but all its automation competitions in the quest to cut costs and maximize margins. Some managers stress to keep "some" minor project roles within US but that's too little to make any real dent in cultivating new talents. Career wise, there is no room for upward mobility and growth; it's a flat hierarchy of engineers and above them, PMs and resource managers, no place for anything else.

avatar
Emerson Response
8y
Thank you for this valuable feedback. We’d love to speak with you directly about your concerns. Please reach out to us at glassdoor.feedback@emerson.com to provide these insights to a member of our HR team.

Explore other reviews about Emerson

5.0
Jun 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great work - life balance

Cons

limited growth opportunities unless willing to relocate

2.0
Jun 25, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great immediate supervisor and their boss. Made top-down communications tolerable. Great co-workers and great collaboration that lifted the entire team.

Cons

(1) RIF based on tenure, not performance. HR is too powerful a department, and everyone fears it. (2) Tenure made you lazy, killed creativity, initiative, and promoted a "yes" culture. (3) During COVID layoffs, CEO pay went from $3.7 million to $15.x million, while employees endured 25% furloughs for 3 months, and management 10% reduction in pay for 6 months - explain how that is reasonable. (4) CEO declared DEI as the way forward for career mobility, and a lot of young, promising talent walked out the door, including DEI-qualified minorities. (5) I was one of those minorities.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All