A solid place to work that needs new leadership - Engineer Elsevier Employee Review

3.0
Dec 16, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They have renovated all the floors in the Philadelphia office to be a more modern workplace. The 16th and 17th floors have the open concept with no assigned seating. The 18th floor (the engineering floor) does have assigned seating with standing desks and all the fun modern stuff you would expect in a tech environment. Speaking of tech environment, Elsevier is making a strong push to become more a technology company than just a health information company. As an engineer, you’ll be using pretty up-to-date programs and protocols to write software. The kitchen is pretty nice with a beer fridge. People in general who work there are quite chill and understanding. Work life balance can be good if you set good guidelines. If you are always available to work, the team will constantly ask you to do something (nights/weekends/holidays/etc). If you are off your phone and not answering Slack messages or emails, people will get the gist and let you live your life outside of work. 401(k) match of 5% is solid.

Cons

Health benefits are quite expensive. Management needs a lot of work. Leadership here is quite poor and it starts from the top. Whether it be non-professional behaviors from execs, to just not understanding how to lead a group, Elsevier needs to really think about what to do here. Some of the software is unstable (especially during high traffic periods) and can crash a lot. Instead of the teams going back and trying to stabilize the platforms that need to be stabilized, there is a constant rush to get new features out and hence more instability. While, yes, this is common with many companies, it would still be nice to work on the issues that consistently plague some of the software.

Explore other reviews about Elsevier

5.0
May 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Industry leader Great benefits Incentive trips Invests heavily in its employees

Cons

Processes can be burdensome and clunky at times

avatar
Elsevier Response
3w
Thank you for this balanced and thoughtful review. We're glad to hear that our benefits and investment in people are making a positive impact, those are commitments we take seriously. On the process feedback: Leadership is actively reviewing operational workflows, and the advice to listen more closely to employee feedback is something we're holding ourselves accountable to. If you're open to it, we'd encourage you to bring specific examples forward through your team or people and culture contacts. Change is most effective when it's grounded in the real experiences of the people doing the work, and that means you. Feel free to reach out to us at elseviergdrev@elsevier.com to provide more information Thank you for staying engaged and for caring enough to share this. It matters.
4.0
Jun 9, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Every direct manager I've had has been excellent: supportive, positive, and trusting me to deliver good work instead of micromanaging. Employees tend to stay, which suggests stability even if not everyone gets promotions or significant raises.

Cons

The pressure to outsource as much as possible, which is common at every publisher, leads to frustration. Because promotions or significant raises seem to be rare, you may be stuck in neutral unless you're very openly ambitious.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All