Toxic - Regulatory Manager Elanco Employee Review

1.0
Aug 20, 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

None. Flaming pile of crap waiting to be bought out and parceled off.

Cons

Negative profits in the foreseeable future. Headcount cuts are the way the company manages poor quarterly results.

avatar
Elanco Response
2y
We recognize that each person has a different experience during their time at Elanco. While we’ve been on a multi-year transformation journey of standup and integration, we are now entering an exciting era of innovation and growth. Elanco’s first half 2023 performance delivered sequential improvement in the underlying revenue performance in our four business areas, and we are positioned to return to growth in the second half of 2023, thanks in part to the contribution from our new innovations beginning to launch. As a result, we raised our financial guidance for all key metrics to reflect our confidence in our underlying business . We also shared our increased investment in U.S. Pet Health to drive portfolio momentum and support launch preparations as we enter what we believe will be a historic window of innovation launches in the early part of 2024.

Explore other reviews about Elanco

5.0
May 14, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Management listens to their emoloyees. Great benefits.

Cons

Old equipment. Lots of forced ot for hourly employees

avatar
Elanco Response
3w
We appreciate your positive feedback regarding management and benefits. At Elanco, we are dedicated to the wellbeing of our employees and are always looking for opportunities for improvement - we thank you for your feedback!
2.0
Feb 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Plenty of great, passionate coworkers who work hard and collaborate. I had a lot of professional flexibility and my job was always interesting. Process teams on the manufacturing floor is a great system. Offsite resources, especially technical experts, are great.

Cons

Expect to be firefighting constantly and frequently fighting against an aging facility and outdated processes. No unified vision or clear prioritization from management. Misalignment between site leadership and upper/off-site management created sustained operational friction and stress for employees. Leadership turnover was frequent, contributing to ongoing instability. Because of all this, there was a super low morale and a feeling of widespread fatigue. Inconsistent communication and decision-making standards contributed to a low-trust culture, including regular informal discussion of colleagues and unprofessional and sometimes intimidating behavior in meetings. Performance feedback and perceived value were highly dependent on shifting leadership dynamics rather than consistent, objective criteria. Employees could move from being strongly supported to heavily criticized with little change in actual performance. Although a nine-box review process was supposedly used, individual outcomes were not transparently shared with employees. Onboarding and training for specialized roles were underdeveloped. Compensation was just fine for workload and scope of responsibility.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All