Making a Difference - Anonymous employee Elanco Employee Review

5.0
Oct 5, 2022
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

People. People. People. The culture and the community. Willing to tackle tough issues for our customers. Exciting innovation pipeline that will tackle areas of unmet need. Building momentum. Most entrepreneurial, non-political corporate environment i've ever worked in. Latest iteration of executive team is much better. really connecting, collaborating and driving the company forward.

Cons

Pace, Priorities and Change. There's a lot going on. but it does feel like it's starting to get better. investing in the right places. see a light at the end of the tunnel re systems transformation.

avatar
Elanco Response
3y
Thank you for your years of service and commitment to Elanco. You’ve described our One Elanco culture well and are excited to hear that you see our global strategy coming to life.

Explore other reviews about Elanco

5.0
Jun 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Treats interns well by providing PTO during the summer shut down

Cons

Didn't really have any issues with the internship.

2.0
Feb 20, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Plenty of great, passionate coworkers who work hard and collaborate. I had a lot of professional flexibility and my job was always interesting. Process teams on the manufacturing floor is a great system. Offsite resources, especially technical experts, are great.

Cons

Expect to be firefighting constantly and frequently fighting against an aging facility and outdated processes. No unified vision or clear prioritization from management. Misalignment between site leadership and upper/off-site management created sustained operational friction and stress for employees. Leadership turnover was frequent, contributing to ongoing instability. Because of all this, there was a super low morale and a feeling of widespread fatigue. Inconsistent communication and decision-making standards contributed to a low-trust culture, including regular informal discussion of colleagues and unprofessional and sometimes intimidating behavior in meetings. Performance feedback and perceived value were highly dependent on shifting leadership dynamics rather than consistent, objective criteria. Employees could move from being strongly supported to heavily criticized with little change in actual performance. Although a nine-box review process was supposedly used, individual outcomes were not transparently shared with employees. Onboarding and training for specialized roles were underdeveloped. Compensation was just fine for workload and scope of responsibility.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All