Unethical workplace - DSP Dungarvin Employee Review

2.0
Apr 18, 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are no pros here

Cons

Scheduling is done with no regard to workers, they will overwork you, and management simply does not care.

avatar
Dungarvin Response
5y
At Dungarvin we do practice and adhere to federal guidelines in regards to pay and hours. Upon a job offer you should have been provided a schedule outlining what shift you were potentially being hired for. Unfortunately, I do not know your particular situation but with the COVID 19 crisis we have asked that staff step up and rise to the occasion as an essential employer as not everyone can continue to work. Overtime wages are 1.5 times the employee's regular hourly rate and is optional. If you have information or concerns about any unethical practices, please contact our Human Resources department.

Explore other reviews about Dungarvin

5.0
Jun 24, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Teamwork is amazing. N questions go unanswered

Cons

none i can think of at this time

1.0
Apr 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The clients are great and the best part about the job.

Cons

Management and Training Deficiencies Ineffective Leadership: On-site management consistently fails to engage in direct training or oversight. Supervisory duties are frequently abdicated to senior staff members who lack formal training authority, leading to inconsistent onboarding. Lack of Professional Development: Management is unresponsive to internal mobility requests and fails to honor promised compensation structures. Pay increases are routinely delayed or ignored, requiring excessive self-advocacy from staff. Hostile Work Environment: There is a culture of verbal discouragement and professional "berating," particularly when staff members address exhaustion or request standard time off. Operational and Clinical Mismanagement Medication Errors: There is a recurring pattern of medication mismanagement. Rather than addressing systemic flaws, management shifts culpability onto individual staff members when discrepancies are reported. Neglect of Client Care: Management has repeatedly declined to seek necessary medical intervention for clients (e.g., insomnia treatments), leading to unsafe conditions for both the client and the staff member on duty. Dishonest Reporting: Documentation regarding client activities and milestones is frequently falsified or significantly embellished, misrepresenting the actual quality of care provided. Ethical Violations and Safety Concerns Unsafe Behavioral Interventions: I witnessed multiple instances of staff using inappropriate and unauthorized redirection methods, including the use of spray bottles and unnecessary physical force. Inadequate Emergency Support: During overnight crises, administrative guidance was negligent. I was once advised to leave a distressed client outside at 1:00 AM rather than receiving actionable assistance. Retaliatory Conduct: Following my resignation, management engaged in unprofessional behavior by contacting me via personal social media platforms to deliver threats regarding future employability.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All