Work environment has improved emensely in the last few years - Anonymous employee Duke Health Employee Review

4.0
Oct 20, 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The connection to the business–-the reason we do all this IT stuff, which is to improve the health of our patients and the state of healthcare in the region--couldn't be more attractive. Senior leadership is going a great job in communicating how our work contributes to, or more accurately, is essential to, the achievement of Duke Health's strategy. Process improvements, such as adoption of the ITIL model to manage the IT business, have also fostered greater accountability, which means that good work is recognized and shoddy work is avoided. People ARE promoted from within. The benefits package at Duke (including an unparalleled rate of contributions to the 403(b) plan on the part of the business) is great. Finally, communications here are excellent, with the senior team talking to us about strategy and strategic initiatives every month, and with access to other stuff you need to know very easy.

Cons

It continues to be a struggle to convince the business to spend more money on IT. Duke Health leadership wants to grow the business quickly (through acquisition, among other methods), but isn't always ready to add the IT staff necessary to support that growth. The electronic health record has been a major asset to the business, but the volume of requests for enhancements and tweaks to the EHR from across the business are at such a high volume that we need a committee just to provide what they refer to as "air traffic control." salaries aren't top-tier, although they have made individual adjustments recently to account for market forces.

Explore other reviews about Duke Health

5.0
Jun 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Scheduling is quite flexible working 3 12s

Cons

Holiday pay is only for major holidays not Christmas Eve

1.0
Jun 23, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The work is meaningful and the team consists of some highly skilled professionals who are dedicated to supporting patients, providers, and the organization. The role provides exposure to complex issues and opportunities for professional growth.

Cons

The department suffers from significant leadership and culture challenges. Employees are hired as experienced professionals but are given little autonomy to perform the work they were hired to do. Leadership frequently inserts itself into routine matters, creating unnecessary delays and fostering a culture of micromanagement rather than trust. Communication is inconsistent and often lacks accountability. Important decisions and changes are frequently communicated verbally without written follow-up, creating confusion and shifting expectations. Employees are expected to remember evolving guidance, identify leadership mistakes, and compensate for communication failures. There is a noticeable gap between leadership messaging and employee experience. Work-life balance, employee engagement, and professional respect are regularly discussed, but many employees do not experience those values in practice. Concerns raised by employees do not appear to result in meaningful change, contributing to low morale and diminished trust in leadership. Leadership often responds to issues by implementing department-wide restrictions rather than addressing the specific individuals or situations involved. As a result, high-performing employees are subjected to increasing oversight and reduced autonomy because leadership is unwilling to address performance concerns directly. Turnover, employee dissatisfaction, and leadership credibility have been ongoing concerns. The department would benefit from leaders who are willing to listen, communicate transparently, accept accountability, and trust the expertise of the professionals they supervise.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All