Good company to work for - Production Engineer Dow Employee Review

4.0
Jun 5, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible schedule. Competitive Salary. Career Opportunities are there after you work in your role for 2-5 years, depending on your work ethic. Good benefits (including employee stock options), good leaders who care about safety of the employees. Nice people to work with, there is a good team spirit. Good food at the cafeteria and all the local places around the plant.

Cons

There is not a training program for new engineers across multiple disciplines. You will learn as the problems come. This is the after math of the split up between Dow and Dupont.You tend to work extra hours a lot since the plant is short staffed, which they are trying to address but changes probably won't happen soon. Maintenance is a weak point since there are not enough mechanics to address all the issues that plant has. You always have to fight to get resources, which gets annoying quickly. The site's infrastructure is bad. All the roads/rail road crossings/parking lots at the site in Orange, TX are in bad shape. They need some TLC or the maintenance costs for all the site's vehicles will go up because they keep hitting these pot holes. Some buildings are very old so when it rains, it leaks.

Explore other reviews about Dow

5.0
Apr 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Culture and the technical expertise within the company provide for a working environment where you don't work in silo and everyone is willing to help support you

Cons

Administrative systems can be burdensome to overcome.

2.0
Mar 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Safety culture, flexibility (although less and less over time). Good health insurance and 401k match

Cons

Dow’s recent years illustrate the challenges of trying to simultaneously satisfy Wall Street’s demands for strong financial performance and aggressive DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) priorities. The company has heavily emphasized inclusion initiatives, including its openly gay CEO publicly sharing that coming out was one of the best days of his life in an internal communication, along with a notable increase in women appointed to senior leadership roles. Hiring practices reportedly require diverse candidate slates—including female candidates—and diverse interview panels before filling positions. These efforts, while well-intentioned, appear to have contributed to a series of questionable strategic decisions. Employees have borne the brunt through repeated rounds of layoffs (including significant cuts announced in recent years), minimal merit increases often in the 2-3% range, stalled promotions, and little turnover at the top levels of leadership. Senior executives seem insulated from the consequences, potentially overlooking how these factors—including their own leadership—may be central to the company’s ongoing struggles.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All