Never thought a chemical company would be this good to work at. - Production Engineer Dow Employee Review

5.0
Jul 4, 2012
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Smart, willing, and highly competent people to work with - Brand name recognition - If you're an Engineer, you can basically write your own ticket anywhere you want once you are there. International travel encouraged, rotation among business encouraged. - You will never get bored on the job or in your career. - Excellent Training programs. - Alot of 'Lifers' here. That in of itself shows how good of a place it is to work. - Great compensation and benefits (only 1/7 companies in the Fortune 500 that still has a pension plan) - They give you alot of responsibility early on - Safety culture the best there is and is taken very seriously - Very professional atmosphere - Very big and serious on diversity inclusion. LGBT friendly- it is like an oasis in the middle of the desert (the desert being the petrochemical & energy industry)

Cons

Forced Ranking system is not favored by all but then again many highly competitive companies have something similar. Locations leave something to be desired but then again if you put in your time, the ticket is yours to write. Inherent in its size, office politics will play a part. Make sure to keep your corporate warrior skills sharp. Dichotomy between operators and salaried people. It is the chemical industry, make sure you know what you're getting into.

Explore other reviews about Dow

5.0
Jun 11, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great team and company culture room for growth and great experience

Cons

Inflexible schedules Poor management sometimes depending on team

2.0
Mar 22, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Safety culture, flexibility (although less and less over time). Good health insurance and 401k match

Cons

Dow’s recent years illustrate the challenges of trying to simultaneously satisfy Wall Street’s demands for strong financial performance and aggressive DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) priorities. The company has heavily emphasized inclusion initiatives, including its openly gay CEO publicly sharing that coming out was one of the best days of his life in an internal communication, along with a notable increase in women appointed to senior leadership roles. Hiring practices reportedly require diverse candidate slates—including female candidates—and diverse interview panels before filling positions. These efforts, while well-intentioned, appear to have contributed to a series of questionable strategic decisions. Employees have borne the brunt through repeated rounds of layoffs (including significant cuts announced in recent years), minimal merit increases often in the 2-3% range, stalled promotions, and little turnover at the top levels of leadership. Senior executives seem insulated from the consequences, potentially overlooking how these factors—including their own leadership—may be central to the company’s ongoing struggles.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All