Good Concept, Poor Execution - Anonymous employee Crossover for Work Employee Review

2.0
May 8, 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Anyone considering a job at Crossover should be aware of a couple things: 1) Depending on the role, you could be applying to work either at Crossover itself (still a startup-stage team of about 100), or one of its many client companies (which make up the vast majority of job listings). 2) Your experience will vary widely depending on who you’re working for. I can only speak to working on Crossover’s internal team, and my experience is a bit different than most. Because I was in a non-technical role, my perspective is as someone who had the opportunity to observe the inner workings of the company, not as a someone weighing in on whether Crossover offers good tech jobs. (Software developers and architects make up the majority of Crossover’s workforce). On to the pros: - Crossover’s intentions are good – democratizing access to tech jobs, hiring talented people no matter where they’re located, enabling people to have more flexibility and better work-life balance through remote work. - The structure of the company is more flat than hierarchical, which might be a pro or con depending on your perspective. - Some positive changes occurred, including shifting internal team members from contractors to W2 employees, with access to discounted health, dental, and life insurance, and offering similar benefits (without employee status) to certain segments of its global workforce. Still no paid time off, though.

Cons

Crossover is experiencing growing pains and doesn’t seem to be handling them very well. Some consistent problems I observed include: - Disorganization: lack of oversight and communication, lack of coordination between departments. Teams, or leadership for that matter, often weren’t aware of what was going on outside their little bubble. My theory is that people were so used to doing their own thing in their own way (that scrappy startup mentality), that once the company got too big for that to work, they ended up with very little cohesion in direction and strategy among different areas of the company. - Management Issues: track record of hiring managers who were inexperienced (or, in my personal experience, who didn't have good soft skills); supervisors overwhelmed with too much on their plate. Turnover was high for my particular team’s management. This makes me think the hiring/vetting process for higher-level team members needs some work. - Poor Communication: For a company that emphasizes transparency, there was a serious lack of information-sharing, especially across different teams and departments, at Crossover. Not only that, but there were no established practices for much of anything, from resource management and accessibility to expectations around everyday collaboration and meetings.

avatar
Crossover for Work Response
8y
We appreciate your comments and your honesty. In the past three years, Crossover has grown from a small startup to a global professional network of more than 4,400 actively contracted partners in 140+ countries. While our growth trajectory has been exciting, there have indeed been some growing pains. Every team and company within the Crossover network has slightly different internal practices, and the working experience can vary depending on your work placement, but we are actively working to improve every team in the organization. We will pass your feedback back to top-level management.

Explore other reviews about Crossover for Work

5.0
Sep 26, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

great company to work for, salary on time

Cons

Demanding work and expects excellence

2
avatar
Crossover for Work Response
8mo
Glad to hear it’s a great fit and that pay’s been smooth. And yes—the bar is high by design. Thanks for the 5 stars and for leaning into the challenge.
2.0
Jul 30, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Crossover does require work from home. For many, this is a good thing and, for me, helped productivity. The salary is good, but depending upon your country's tax situation it might not be as good as it seems on the surface.

Cons

Where do I start? I tried to be objective with my 2-star rating; Crossover isn't unethical or stealing from their employees or anything like that. However, for a seasoned professional, be warned... I joined in one of the Very High Dollar executive-level positions being driven by their desire to acquire 50+ companies in the near term. I'm in the US. As such (and I knew this going in), the tax consequences for being a contractor are non-trivial. There's also the consideration that you must fund any perks yourself - healthcare, retirement, etc. While the salary is generous enough to do that, it's not as shiny as it seems on the surface. Your mileage may vary depending upon your home country. What I really disliked: Constant tracking/ justification of work stream. Seriously. As others have pointed out, it's difficult to actually *get* credit for a full work week without working extra. Especially in some of the higher-level, more 'creative' positions such as architect, product management, etc. there's minimal or no opportunity to review or think over things. For me, I work in bursts followed by small distractions in which I'm running the problems in the background of my thoughts. A variety of coworkers and management in my history have almost universally commented about the volume of good work I produce. Even my peers at Crossover had no problem with the quantity or quality of my production. However, their tracking software and systems simply don't credit anything other than linear, constant "work". This was bad for me, resulting in me working extra, reworking things as I attempting to change my processes, "faking" it, or simply working longer to attempt to make my hours. I also felt bad for some of the more junior or "factory" positions. It really is tracked by the minute, with lots of incentive to find "problems" with productivity. This is really a thinly-veiled method of wringing blood out of a turnip, by finding flaws or gaps and essentially docking pay. Yeah, the salaries are good but the amount of ancillary work that goes into making "real" hours is awful, and I felt like a chump contributing to it. I had to quit for my sanity.

1585
avatar
Crossover for Work Response
7y
We appreciate your review. Our wages are paid in USD, so it's not going to be as competitive in high tech markets like San Francisco or Boston in the United States where software development is ultra-competitive. However, wages for the same jobs are very competitive in other US cities and outside the US. Sometimes these wages can be 5-6x the local average. Our business model is unique and isn't for everyone. We aren't trying to be like everyone else. The future of work is being redefined. We pride ourselves in being a pioneer in this new paradigm. If you want to know more about this work model, you can read about it here: https://medium.com/@crossoverforwork/the-factory-model-enabling-massive-scale-across-business-functions-98b18ad574f8
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All