Avoid this place - Anonymous employee CouchSurfing Employee Review

1.0
Feb 4, 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The coworkers (not leadership) are cool

Cons

Note to everyone including Glassdoor the CEO is not Tony it is Patrick Dugan. He tries to avoid being known as the CEO. The leadership team is a joke. The CEO is mostly absent and when he is around he is abusive, manipulative and extremely touchy. He does not value the employees and any effort to present feedback is met with a severe angry response, very defensive and sensitive. We had an anonymous feedback tool for a couple weeks, but the few pieces of negative feedback made him so upset that he berated us during a company all hands and then shut down the tool without replacement. This sort of behavior successfully pushes people within the company to stop speaking up and to instead just nod and agree to get the conversation over with as soon as possible. He refuses to allow any transparency into the state of the business. I’ve been told alternatingly that we’re financially stable and fine and we're in dire enough straights that we cant afford raises. I was harassed by him when I asked if annual salary reviews were happening at the time we had been told annual salary reviews would be happening. What does the COO even do? He mostly just seems to make decrees about aesthetics and about what we can and can’t keep on our desks (you may keep nothing on your desk, not even photos of your family) and how often we are allowed to go out to lunch together as a team (once a week is not allowed, once a month maximum). This all has happened while “Culture” is supposedly one of our three main priorities for the business. I don’t think I have ever worked with someone who was more of a control freak. Also the things that he chooses to spend money on are mind boggling. Flying the entire team on a week’s notice to another country for over a week? “Plant ladies” who come in to design a plant scheme for the new office? Kombucha on tap?These are prioritized, yet you have to fight tooth + nail for one small raise after years of hard work, promotions and promises. The CPO (Product) runs the company for all intents and purposes. She has never worked in a tech company before but has the confidence and power to tell the rest of us how its done. Her answer to almost any problem is to add a recurring meeting and more process. Its exhausting. If things are not done to her exact specifications she will steamroll work and demand that her hoops are jumped through. She also pretends she runs things as a democracy when it’s actually a dictatorship. An example: in a recent offsite to develop a new solution to a problem (the one in another country), during the decision phase which was supposed to be vote-based we voted for one solution but she designated herself the chooser and chose her own solution instead. She nearly matches the COO in her control freak nature. She recently released a spreadsheet about what is allowed to be put in certain drawers in the office and any new item that doesn’t have a set drawer needs to go through her in order to decide which drawer it should go in. Is this really a good use of time or energy? Key developers leave or are fired and she has prioritized hiring a new PM (to replace the PM that was fired because she didn’t like her) for a team that has only two full time developers rather than hiring more developers. The logic doesn’t make any sense. In general priorities across the board are constantly changing and usually nonsensical though when she is confronted with this she shifts the blame to the CEO. Whenever these three see a problem the fix that they think is right is to hire more management or add more layers of effort that someone has to go through in order to do their jobs. Replacing the people who produce actual work is a low priority compared to hiring more managers to breathe down people’s necks. The perceived problem from their point of view seems to be that we dont try hard enough and that there is a trust issue and that we need more oversight. Quite a few people have left recently some by choice and some being secretly fired, which mostly includes people who had been with the company for years and were passionate about the vision. People are fired because the CPO doesn’t like them or because they bring feedback to the delicate CEO, but the rest of us are told that they quit by choice. The company is small and we all talk to eachother privately so we all know the truth but the lie is repeatedly told. One person last month had such a rough experience being treated abusively by the CEO that he quit on the spot with no notice. This has had a big impact on morale. Overall the company has the potential to be great but will not reach it with the CEO + COO + CPO in charge. I would never recommend joining this company to anyone while they are in place. I hope the good people who do work here find ways out because we all deserve better.

avatar
CouchSurfing Response
7y
We have chosen to prioritize the community and employees over everything else. Publicizing or prioritizing who currently holds the CEO title is not important to Couchsurfing. The Couchsurfing community and Couchsurfing team as a whole are the important top priorities to Couchsurfing. The CEO role can involve a lot of outward-facing work. Most effective leaders prioritize observing and listening over direct participation. Also, you likely would not want any CEO deeply involved in every decision. The CEO is responsible for realizing Couchsurfing’s potential, keeping the Couchsurfing community safe, ensuring that employees can count on being paid so they can put food on the tables for their families and meet personal financial obligations, sourcing the resources the company needs to be successful, providing performance and results for investors, and more. Perhaps some interactions are less than ideal given the weight of and stress from these responsibilities. The CEO comes from a place of gratitude to have the opportunity to work for the Couchsurfing community alongside the Couchsurfing team. The feedback we received from the anonymous feedback tool was primarily superficial and not particularly useful. When thoughtfully challenged on anonymous feedback, even while keeping their anonymity, people simply didn’t want to engage in constructive dialogues. We took it offline, have bi-monthly company-wide meetings to provide updates, scheduled weekly 1:1s and everyone is available and responsive via other internal communication tools. Though we may not always agree with or take action on the feedback, there has never been an instance of an employee experiencing reprisal as a result of sharing their thoughts, concerns or ideas. With regard to transparency, we are sorry this was your impression. Clearly we still have some work to do here. We take the allegation of workplace harassment very seriously. We have reviewed the CEO’s written communications and have found no evidence of workplace harassment. We have never received any complaints, reports or even inklings of workplace harassment at Couchsurfing and encourage anyone that legitimately experiences harassment to follow the proper resolution channels. We appreciate your recognition of the COO’s attention to detail. There are many moving parts to a business, many of which employees may never be aware of, and he successfully and exceptionally manages them. Our goal is to support good workplace hygiene that includes office rules around office clutter, dirty dishes, and general professional workplace organization. We do hold several yearly off-sites since we are a globally distributed team. These meetings are 100% optional though we do encourage those who can to join. This past fall we found that meeting in San Francisco where we had held several past off-sites was less fresh and more expensive than alternatives. We provided a list of options to the team who then chose Barcelona. We also asked what week worked best for them without planning 3+ months in the future. As this event was held during the off-peak travel season, Barcelona was a more economical choice and far more affordable than San Francisco. We wholeheartedly disagree regarding the qualifications and capabilities of the COO and CPO and will let their professional resume speak for themselves. The expectation that employees adhere to company processes should not come as a surprise to any legitimate professional. Also, while we solicit feedback from everyone in the company that does not mean that every decision will be made based solely on that feedback. Employees are never fired because they are “not liked”. There are several reasons reasons we may let talent go but likability is not one of them. We have over 40 full-time and part-time employees, contractors and consultants and only 5 people in managerial roles, not including the CEO. That ratio is in line with industry standards. We respect the privacy of our colleagues and by no means deviate from any standard practices of nearly every professional organization when it comes to personnel transitions. Announcing to the company when someone is terminated will never be a company policy. If there are specific situations that require additional context, we provide that. The person that quit on the spot had been at the company for less than a year and was demanding a pay increase of 50%. We use reliable market information to appropriately and competitively compensate individuals for their roles in the company and adjust that compensation based on combination of performance and results. As such, we do not make freewheeling changes to compensation and this type of raise was well above our norm. We genuinely wish them well in their pursuit of opportunities that can meet their compensation needs. We would like to wholeheartedly thank you for leaving this feedback and wish you well on your future endeavors.

Explore other reviews about CouchSurfing

5.0
Oct 21, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Couchsurfing has a global team full of smart, genuinely nice people. Everyone I work with has always treated me with respect and kindness. Some of the older reviews were written during a time when the company was changing hands. I’m sorry some people left on bad terms, but those experiences do not reflect the company I've known for many years. This is actually a really cool place to work. Everyone here is genuinely focused on making the platform better. The community is passionate, the mission is unique, and it’s rewarding to know your work directly impacts people around the world.

Cons

It’s a small company, so we all wear a lot of hats. That can make things busy at times, and you need to be flexible with changing priorities. It can be stressful if you’re not self-motivated or used to managing multiple responsibilities. If you enjoy variety, being hands-on, and tackling multiple challenges, you will probably thrive here.

1
5.0
Apr 19, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I really love the people I work with. The other engineers are extremely talented and I learn from them every single day. The work is challenging and I constantly feel like I'm pushing the limits of my abilities and growing professionally as a result. The swings in the office are a great place to meditate on a hard problem you're chewing on, and if that doesn't do it surely a game of ping pong will. Most people in the office have a standing desk and we also have a 'living room' full of couches, so you never have to sit at the same boring desk day after day. We've started doing Tech Talk Tuesdays twice a month where someone presents a new language/framework/concept during lunch. The food is great. Like most people here, our chef is really, really good at what he does.

Cons

I love my work so much, that sometimes its hard to balance out other parts of my life. I find myself staying up through the night and hacking gleefully away on weekends to nail the projects I'm working on. Let me be completely clear: This is NOT because I feel pressure from management to work a lot. Its because the management creates an environment where the engineers are encouraged to build stuff, and to take pride in what you've built. The work-life balance thing is important though, so I guess this is a Con. But I can think of worse problems to have.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All