Note to everyone including Glassdoor the CEO is not Tony it is Patrick Dugan. He tries to avoid being known as the CEO.
The leadership team is a joke. The CEO is mostly absent and when he is around he is abusive, manipulative and extremely touchy. He does not value the employees and any effort to present feedback is met with a severe angry response, very defensive and sensitive. We had an anonymous feedback tool for a couple weeks, but the few pieces of negative feedback made him so upset that he berated us during a company all hands and then shut down the tool without replacement. This sort of behavior successfully pushes people within the company to stop speaking up and to instead just nod and agree to get the conversation over with as soon as possible. He refuses to allow any transparency into the state of the business. I’ve been told alternatingly that we’re financially stable and fine and we're in dire enough straights that we cant afford raises. I was harassed by him when I asked if annual salary reviews were happening at the time we had been told annual salary reviews would be happening.
What does the COO even do? He mostly just seems to make decrees about aesthetics and about what we can and can’t keep on our desks (you may keep nothing on your desk, not even photos of your family) and how often we are allowed to go out to lunch together as a team (once a week is not allowed, once a month maximum). This all has happened while “Culture” is supposedly one of our three main priorities for the business. I don’t think I have ever worked with someone who was more of a control freak. Also the things that he chooses to spend money on are mind boggling. Flying the entire team on a week’s notice to another country for over a week? “Plant ladies” who come in to design a plant scheme for the new office? Kombucha on tap?These are prioritized, yet you have to fight tooth + nail for one small raise after years of hard work, promotions and promises.
The CPO (Product) runs the company for all intents and purposes. She has never worked in a tech company before but has the confidence and power to tell the rest of us how its done. Her answer to almost any problem is to add a recurring meeting and more process. Its exhausting. If things are not done to her exact specifications she will steamroll work and demand that her hoops are jumped through. She also pretends she runs things as a democracy when it’s actually a dictatorship. An example: in a recent offsite to develop a new solution to a problem (the one in another country), during the decision phase which was supposed to be vote-based we voted for one solution but she designated herself the chooser and chose her own solution instead. She nearly matches the COO in her control freak nature. She recently released a spreadsheet about what is allowed to be put in certain drawers in the office and any new item that doesn’t have a set drawer needs to go through her in order to decide which drawer it should go in. Is this really a good use of time or energy? Key developers leave or are fired and she has prioritized hiring a new PM (to replace the PM that was fired because she didn’t like her) for a team that has only two full time developers rather than hiring more developers. The logic doesn’t make any sense. In general priorities across the board are constantly changing and usually nonsensical though when she is confronted with this she shifts the blame to the CEO.
Whenever these three see a problem the fix that they think is right is to hire more management or add more layers of effort that someone has to go through in order to do their jobs. Replacing the people who produce actual work is a low priority compared to hiring more managers to breathe down people’s necks. The perceived problem from their point of view seems to be that we dont try hard enough and that there is a trust issue and that we need more oversight.
Quite a few people have left recently some by choice and some being secretly fired, which mostly includes people who had been with the company for years and were passionate about the vision. People are fired because the CPO doesn’t like them or because they bring feedback to the delicate CEO, but the rest of us are told that they quit by choice. The company is small and we all talk to eachother privately so we all know the truth but the lie is repeatedly told. One person last month had such a rough experience being treated abusively by the CEO that he quit on the spot with no notice. This has had a big impact on morale.
Overall the company has the potential to be great but will not reach it with the CEO + COO + CPO in charge. I would never recommend joining this company to anyone while they are in place. I hope the good people who do work here find ways out because we all deserve better.