Terrible practices - Anonymous employee Coldflow Employee Review

1.0
Sep 7, 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Thr boys are ok. But nothing else I can possibly say that was a Pro.

Cons

Terrible managers that expect you to work 24/7. Extremely low pay below legal standards. Owners are bullies who intimate people and encourages bad behavior. Absolutely nothing ethical about this place. HR only protect their own backs.

Explore other reviews about Coldflow

1.0
May 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Workers were nice to work with

Cons

Organisation was unorganised and rude

1.0
Aug 12, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I joined Coldflow as a mechanical engineer intern and later transitioned into a full-time role in operation team. Unfortunately, I didn’t gain much professionally — the environment lacked proper mentoring and was dominated by internal favoritism and office politics. Employees with personal or family connections received lenient treatment, while others like myself were unfairly blamed or sidelined. Attempts to raise concerns led to more hostility, not resolution. Task assignment was inconsistent and sometimes gender-biased. Overall, I found the work culture emotionally draining and professionally unproductive. I initially pursued formal action but decided to withdraw it after a senior leader offered support and a reference, which I sincerely appreciated. Still, the experience left me with a lasting awareness of how damaging unchecked favoritism can be. I hope the company reevaluates its internal culture for the benefit of future employees.

Cons

Workplace culture lacked fairness and transparency. Nepotism and favoritism were frequent, particularly among team members with personal or family ties. Management approach was inconsistent, and some supervisors exercised poor judgment when resolving internal conflicts. Certain employees were shielded from accountability, while others were blamed unfairly. Attempts to raise valid concerns were often interpreted as insubordination, and communication channels between staff and leadership could be dismissive or confrontational. Discriminatory remarks and gender-biased task assignments were occasionally made, creating a hostile work environment for those without internal connections.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All