Time for a modern review (business side of CloudWave) - Business Side of CloudWave CloudWave Employee Review

5.0
Jun 12, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

CloudWave is investing in business professionalism as much as it's investing in technology- this means great opportunities for IT people from all walks of life. This is a small community, it's much quieter than other hosting companies in the area and they really want customer-focused people who are relaxed but on point. The company is growing and it's getting more profitable year over year, the best part is the sense of humility from the President down to the local leaders- we are doing great work and no one is "chest thumping." I think the pay and benefits are very fair and I appreciate this company for hiring people from multiple age groups- culture fit and teamwork is the key.

Cons

The company is expanding quickly and some of the tedious day-to-day activities like scattered documentation, evolving priorities and new products and partnerships- don't make your job easier, but these are minor challenges to accept to be part of an organization with good opportunities and tremendous admiration from our clients.

Explore other reviews about CloudWave

5.0
Jul 1, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Benefits, PTO program, people, culture, senior leadership team

Cons

communication can be an issue at times, trying to get things accomplished

2.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Amazing coworkers to work alongside. Pay is okay for the position - not stellar, but okay. Extensive paid time off was granted, even when given short notices to manager - very understanding of life happenings. Flexible work schedule and could change as necessary (as long as it still made sense from the businesses perspective of course), and never was made to work outside of work hours - point was made to respect work/life balance. Promises were made to promote within to higher positions like engineering, although this was only after problems within the company could be addressed which never were - potential career growth opportunities, though was never personally seen.

Cons

Responsibilities and expectations continually expanded due to ongoing scope creep, frequent procedural overhauls, and unclear or constantly changing documentation. Employees were often directed to reference isolated pages within extensive documentation repositories that were regularly revised without notice, making consistency and retention difficult. Critical infrastructure failures routinely disrupted workflows, and employees were pressured to resolve these issues despite such responsibilities falling outside their defined roles. At the same time, staff were expected to exceed established job requirements without corresponding compensation, maintain legacy workflows while simultaneously supporting and developing new operational processes, and compensate for known engineering shortages acknowledged by company leadership.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All