Declining work environment despite decent pay and vision - Care Promoter ChenMed Employee Review

2.0
Apr 18, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Vision is excellent. Pay is decent.

Cons

At first it was a great place to work. Now, not so much. Have been working short staffed for quite some time now. The job is tough, so many tasks, so little time. Yet upper management expect us to do more, more, more. Heaping tasks upon us all the while knowing how short handed we are. Do this, do that...it's ALL about the NUMBERS anymore, no longer about quality care. AND if the patient doesn't comply with the PCPs advice or they don't show for their appointments, it's the staff's fault. It is ridiculous! They tell us over and over-it isn't about the numbers but if we don't meet the metrics, we get penalized. Just isn't worth it any longer. Actively seeking other employment. Ask any of the front line workers-PCPs, CP,s CFs, RTs or CCs...they will tell you the truth. Notice all the glowing reviews are from management positions, not the front line workers. Sorry, ChenMed, I have not had many good days with you.

Explore other reviews about ChenMed

5.0
May 19, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-ValueBased care driven. -Mission and Vision. -Growth opportunity. -Work-life balance.

Cons

Challenges to meet metrics dependent on market/location- but not impossible

avatar
ChenMed Response
5d
Thank you for the 5-star review and for helping us bring more good days to our patients. We appreciate your feedback regarding center metrics. Each community presents unique circumstances, and we appreciate your recognition that success is still achievable when we support each other.
1.0
Jun 16, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pay and benefits are above the market average.

Cons

While the organization presents itself as mission-driven and patient-focused, my experience was that employees at all levels were under significant pressure to meet performance metrics. This created a stressful work environment where morale was low and tensions frequently ran high. I observed a high level of turnover during my time with the company, including employees who resigned unexpectedly or were terminated with little warning. As a result, many staff members felt uncertain about their job security and hesitant to speak openly about concerns. One of the biggest challenges was balancing patient care with organizational expectations. The patient population has complex medical, social, and financial needs, yet providers are expected to manage large workloads while meeting numerous performance targets. At times, I felt that cost-containment and metric achievement were prioritized over clinical judgment. For example, I was involved in the care of a patient with severe hip pain related to avascular necrosis. I advocated for specialty evaluation because I believed it was medically necessary, but obtaining that referral proved difficult. I was told to manage her pain with Tylenol and trochanteric bursa injections. The patient ultimately presented to the hospital in severe pain and ortho recommended prompt surgical intervention. Experiences like this created frustration and moral distress when I felt unable to provide the level of care I believed patients needed. This position may be a good fit for individuals who thrive in highly structured, metric-driven environments. However, those seeking greater autonomy in clinical decision-making or a workplace culture that prioritizes provider input may find the role challenging.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All