employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Check Point Software Technologies

Engaged employer

Great UK operation hampered by HQ - Account Manager Check Point Software Technologies Employee Review

4.0
Dec 18, 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fantastic tech, and the roadmap from Dorit is fantastic, and gives the incumbent firewall customer base a great lever to properly transform Great UK team Great benefits The channel is great and has close relationships

Cons

No belief in marketing at ALL by HQ Micro management increasingly encroaching No comms in advance from HQ, key execs randomly arrive and demand C-Level meetings at short or no notice

Explore other reviews about Check Point Software Technologies

5.0
Jun 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very stable security company. No massive layoffs. Great people.

Cons

Could grow faster to get better stock price.

1.0
May 30, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The core responsibilities offer solid experience, and many team members are dedicated, talented, and great to work with.

Cons

Lack of HR Support: The company lacks a safe, objective framework for employee feedback. When legitimate management issues were raised to HR, no corrective action was taken. Instead, it resulted in direct retaliation from leadership, which was left unaddressed by the organization. Significant Under-Market Pay: Compensation is well below industry standards for similar scopes of work. To give context, transitioning into a comparable role at a different company yielded a 37% increase in base pay. Flawed & Inaccurate Sales Compensation: The commission and incentive structures for the sales organization are unnecessarily convoluted. This complexity frequently leads to errors in commission payouts, causing widespread frustration among sellers. Notably, these calculation mistakes are consistently detrimental to the employee and rarely seem to resolve in the seller's favor. Siloed "HQ-Centric" Culture: There is a heavy disconnect between corporate headquarters and regional teams. The culture feels highly insular, creating an "in-group" dynamic where those outside of headquarters have very limited visibility, influence, or opportunities for career progression.

3
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All