employer cover photo

Chariots Capital

Is this your company?

High turnover, poor leadership, and stressful work culture - Senior Level Chariots Capital Employee Review

1.0
Aug 13, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

• Punctual working hours with no expectation for overtime. • Ability to maintain work-life balance due to fixed end-of-day schedule.

Cons

• Leadership selection often appears to prioritize personal image over relevant qualifications and experience. • Some leaders lack prior experience in their roles, resulting in poor team support and ineffective decision-making. • Feedback is not always received constructively, and criticism may be taken personally, creating a culture of fear and retaliation. • Senior leadership style is highly authoritarian, with little to no avenue for employee feedback or suggestions for improvement. • High turnover rate, largely due to management making employment decisions based on personal preference rather than performance or fit. • Annual leave usage is tightly restricted; taking extended leave, even when entitled, may be frowned upon by management. • Decision-making from senior leadership can be perceived as biased, leading to unequal treatment of employees. • Attendance at company retreats or overseas trips is mandatory, and refusal may have severe consequences. • Employees can be penalized or issued warnings for issues caused by management decisions, even when following instructions. • Senior leadership exhibits unpredictable or erratic behavior, creating confusion and stress. • Appointed leaders across subdivisions may dismiss employees who challenge their decisions or provide constructive feedback. Terminations can be abrupt, with little consideration for proper offboarding, including retrieval of company equipment. • Leadership may misrepresent company events, framing them as team celebrations, when the actual purpose is personal. • Attendance at these events is often mandatory, which can create confusion and frustration among employees. • Certain company events or trips may appear to favor employees based on appearance or personal preference rather than inclusion, which can create a sense of unfairness and exclusion. • Some company events, such as yacht trips, may exclude certain employees, leading to a sense of favoritism and unequal treatment.

Explore other reviews about Chariots Capital

5.0
Sep 26, 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I have been working with this company, and my experience has been very positive. Leadership is supportive, the boss genuinely cares for the team, and opportunities for growth are available to those who show commitment and initiative. The culture encourages accountability and provides an environment where individuals can thrive if they are willing to learn and take responsibility. As with any professional organisation, there are times when difficult decisions must be made. In some cases, staff who repeatedly make mistakes and refuse to take responsibility may face dismissal. In other cases, a single but very serious mistake can be treated as a major offence, leading to immediate termination. While these decisions may not always be well received by those affected, they reflect the company’s responsibility to uphold professional, ethical, and safety standards. It is understandable that some former employees may share negative reviews after leaving under such circumstances. However, based on my experience, this company operates with fairness and integrity. Those who take ownership of their work and embrace opportunities for growth are consistently supported and rewarded.

Cons

Some employees may find the accountability culture challenging if they are not used to owning up to errors.

1.0
Jan 6, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Company initially appeared promising with ambitious expansion plans - Exposure to multiple business functions due to lean structure - Some colleagues are supportive on a peer level.

Cons

- Termination was handled abruptly and unprofessionally. During the termination meeting, company property was taken without prior notice and without any formal handover or documentation process. - The company operates under a strong, authoritarian, fear-based culture. Decision-making is centralised under a single individual, leaving little to no room for discussion, feedback, or independent thinking. - Employees are expected to prioritise company events over personal commitments, even when events are held overseas or conflict with pre-arranged plans. Personal boundaries are frequently disregarded. - Leave entitlement exists formally but is discouraged in practice. Taking an extended leave will receive negative reactions from senior management especially from the managing director/CEO itself. - There is no accountability at the management level. Errors are routinely pushed down to junior staff while managers are not held responsible for their decisions. - Minor mistakes can result in immediate warning letters, creating a high-pressure environment driven by fear rather than development. - The company culture prioritises blame-shifting over problem-solving, which impacts morale and productivity. - There are concerns around manufactured positive reviews, which do not align with the volume and consistency of negative experiences shared by former employees. - Employee contributions are not adequately rewarded. Despite significant spending on expansion and events, bonuses and meaningful recognition are lacking. - Multiple sub-companies have been created without proper SOPs or governance at the main company level, resulting in confusion, inefficiency, and poor operational structure. Threats of termination or shutting down sub-divisions are frequently used as control tactics, contributing to an unstable and stressful work environment.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All