Abuse - Anonymous employee Centre 404 Employee Review

1.0
Mar 20, 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I cant think of one good pro. The job was exhausting, no progression....Instead staff didn't work well or come in on time. Staff were always upset because they were never notified that new staff would start without induction....that is the managers job....to train and induct new staff members.

Cons

When a service user was abused management didn't bother to investigate or notify the parents. Staff didn't record medication well and handover was a joke. Working alone is a liability because ur an easy target to shift blame on to.

avatar
Centre 404 Response
9y
Centre 404 is a successful local organisation that has been operating for 65 years. We are committed to providing high quality support and services to children and adults with a learning disability. We take all concerns seriously and operate clear and effective safeguarding, health and safety and personnel procedures. We actively encourage our staff to raise any concerns and feedback with us during their employment. I would encourage any candidates that may be considering whether to apply for a vacancy at Centre 404 to also read other staff reviews that are on our website.

Explore other reviews about Centre 404

5.0
Jun 9, 2026
Anonymous freelancer
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- A genuine passion amongst all employees I interacted with to create positive change. - Very good communication. - Consistent desire to improve the charity and proactively working towards their goals. - Often very creative in their approach.

Cons

- A difficult sector more broadly.

1.0
Jan 7, 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some staff genuinely care about the people they support, bringing warmth and dedication that keeps things running despite chaos. Flexible approaches in pockets of the organisation allow for creative solutions, if you can actually find the person who empowers you. Unique opportunities to witness organisational dynamics firsthand, a masterclass in “how not to manage” if nothing else.

Cons

Senior management seems allergic to accountability, often disappearing when decisions need defending. Consistent bias in decision-making, favouring familiarity over merit. Overreliance on delegation without oversight, leaving staff to patch holes left by “management.” Inertia is celebrated—change, efficiency, or initiative can be treated as suspicious activities. Meetings often feel like theatre: a lot of words, minimal action. Clear communication is rare; “transparency” is treated as optional. Task prioritisation is chaotic—urgent matters ignored while trivial ones are amplified. Laziness at the top frequently trickles down, creating a culture of minimal effort. Recognition is inconsistent, usually reserved for a select few while hard work elsewhere goes unnoticed. Professional development is under-supported, leaving motivated staff to fend for themselves.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All