Great work, poor management - Anonymous employee CSP Associates Employee Review

3.0
May 14, 2019
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Interesting, compelling work. Generally smart people, although quality of junior talent declining quickly due to wholesale departures.

Cons

Poor management and culture. Lack of meritocracy and playing favorites have lead to key departures at both senior and junior levels.

Explore other reviews about CSP Associates

5.0
Mar 15, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

CSP is the gold standard in Aerospace & Defense transaction diligence. You get to learn from the best and you work with all the top private equity sponsors in the world. Amazing way to get 10 years of experience in 2.

Cons

You work hard and expectations are high but you are well compensated.

4.0
Feb 12, 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Compensation including bonus structure merit-based and aligned with larger Management Consulting firms. Quality of work very interesting if curious about the aerospace & defense market. Relatively flat structure with all team members below the Managing Director level exposed to similar work responsibilities. High level of interaction with corporate management (often $1B+ global companies) as well as private equity clients (including the largest funds). Boutique-nature of firm allows for vertical movement and exposure to all levels of internal management. Quality learning experience leveraging institutional knowledge of upper management. Exposure to both strategic consulting work and M&A advisory work. Working hours dependent on employee efficiency and preference, 'face time' in the office not much of an issue. Unlike larger consulting firms, travel required less than twice a month on average for no more than two/three nights. Travel well. Significant opportunity to demonstrate talent and hard work to upper management.

Cons

Coordination and project management between upper management could be improved. Narrow work-life balance a result of high volume of engagements annually. Often required to balance 2-3 engagements at once. Consequently, difficult to plan long-term (e.g., vacations) as a result of short-term notice of new engagements. Less resources compared to larger consulting firms such as dedicated HR, IT, research teams. Teams often spread thin by volume of engagements annually; increase of head count specifically at the lower level would alleviate constraints and burden. No formal training program, expectation to learn through experience; a positive for some.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All