used to be good in the 70s but theyve gotten greedy over time. - Conductor CPKC Employee Review

1.0
Mar 29, 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

pay is middle class, but when a company makes 5000 million in revenue a year off their employees its the least they can do. this is a classic example of wealth inequality and this company should be broken up.

Cons

-CEO hunter harrison makes an obcene amount of money. he is imposing a culture of fear where u are always being watched by management for mistakes. -on call shift work and u can be away from home for over 24 hours. this will destroy your marriage. when u drive home after having worked a 12 hour shift which started at 1 AM in the Morning, its worse than driving drunk. company doesnt have the decency to pay for taxis for their on call night shift employees. -they give u 5 weeks vacation after 18 years -> this would be considered illegal in europe where u have a right to 4 or 5 or 6 or more weeks of vacation. -used to be able to work 4 hours and get paid for 8 if u hustled and used to be able to get drunk and enjoy yourself. used to be able to go to work on a voluntary basis, u will now be fired for not attending. the company has becoming increasingly greedy over the past 35 years. -u have to put 35 years in before u can collect your pension and there is talks of getting rid of it for new hires. -the company doesnt bother to negoitate with the striking union, they just wait for the government (which they bribe) to legislate them back to work.

Explore other reviews about CPKC

5.0
Dec 20, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great pay, and benefits, good environment,

Cons

First 3-5 years stressful until you get familiar and understand how railroads work.

1
2.0
May 29, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Lots of opportunities to provide value

Cons

Poor leadership at the C-level. CIO has no control over the direction of the IT landscape beyond what is dictated to her by the CEO and other business owners. The IT environment is almost solely controlled by the demands of the business at the cost of being able to manage and adapt to needs. 20 years behind the market in the adoption of cloud technology. Existing cloud strategy was built by engineers pressed into the role of architects and learning as they progressed along. No automation or DevOps presence whatsoever outside what the platform teams use to simplify their own workloads. Remote work is considered a 4-letter word and is extremely frowned upon as anything other than an as-needed and pre-approved option. Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery are still done using backups and shadow copies of key infrastructure, and those key systems are decided upon at the time the tests are planned instead of testing the company's infrastructure in its entirety. Data centers are geographically separated, but are significantly disparate in what is physically hosted and accessible. Recognition and rewards are overtly encouraged, but are covertly handed out based on the level of visibility and impact to the business and stakeholders. Senior leadership constantly touts open-door policy and approachability, but give off vibes and impressions opposite of the overt policy. The company puts on a show of being diverse and inclusive. Case in point, the hiring of a female CIO. The problem is that working within an 'old boys network' leadership, it doesn't matter how inclusive and diverse the company appears because those elements are never given the opportunity to show their value.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All