Hideous and exploitative company – avoid at all costs - Editor CBR Employee Review

1.0
Nov 1, 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Flexibility - Fun topics to edit

Cons

With a pitiful base salary paying less than minimum wage (in the UK), CBR demand an inordinate amount of work. I worked there for a year and my responsibilities increased month on month while our quota of editing 10 articles a day stayed the same. To put this in perspective, here are our weekly goals: - Adhere to strict 60-page PowerPoint guidelines for edits. Side note: the writing is often low quality due to the writers being paid peanuts ($18) for articles of 800 - 1400 words. - Optimise the 50 articles you edit using SEO techniques, including image alt text, URLs, headers, and general layout. - Check each feature image to make sure they meet high standards and create new ones where necessary. We were told we should use apps like photoshop but they wouldn't give us a license, meaning they hoped we'd fork out for it ourselves... - Attend weekly meetings and training workshops where the lead editors do-not-stop-talking. Expect to hear the same lines regurgitated and endless blame tactics passively aggressively aimed at you and your peers. And no, you're not compensated, and yes, you still need to make your quota those days. - Send long and detailed feedback emails to each writer when you spot errors in their work. Fun fact: you'll never not spot errors. No, this doesn't count towards your quota either. - Manage over 20+ writers (there's a huge turnover of staff so you'll get millions added to your list over time). - Research list trends using Google Trends, PubInsights, and internal data, and ideate 50 articles a week. (200 a month). Yes, this is on top of your editing quota. - Approve 50 writer pitches a week and explain why. Note this down in your editor tracker spreadsheet. Yes, this is also on top of your editing quota. - Fill in said daily editor tracker with everything you've done, because you now love being micromanaged. - Try to accept shifting goalposts because management has no idea how to actually run CBR and meet their targets. Their whole business model is based on exploitation and blame. - If you explain the expectations of the role are unfair and unrealistic, accept the fact you'll be 'let go' that day. - Understand that when they say 'how can we support you?' it's a backhanded way of saying 'you're not bleeding hard enough for us.' - Give up all your evenings and weekends as your quota now haunts you and doesn't want you to have a life.

Explore other reviews about CBR

5.0
Dec 30, 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Closely working with editorial team whose goals are to ensure work is of high-quality that's been a rarity in my 25+ years of experience writing professionally. Creative freedom for covering subjects relevant to our readers in thoughtful ways that highlight individual opinions without resorting to snark or sensationalism. Atmosphere fosters a sense of teamwork even with remote workers, especially if colleagues have questions or need help. Sensitive support and consideration from superiors when real-life issues arise. Recognition for successful work both internally and publicly. Freedom for diversity of opinion amongst writers covering similar projects, so readers get a variety of critical opinions both positive and negative. Editorial feedback focuses on constructive critique to ensure that articles both meet formatting/content value standards, while keeping the focus primarily on high-quality writing. Editors are extremely open to original and sometimes unorthodox ideas, shaping them to ensure they meet CBR standards while maintaining the unique point of view of the writers. Editors also offer a steady stream of ideas for topics of interest to readers, often tailored to individual writer strengths while still leaving room for the stories to reflect specific opinions. Culture values civility and kindness between colleagues and superiors overall.

Cons

Quota-based writer positions no longer seem to have paid time-off (though accommodations can be made for personal/family emergencies). The bespoke content management system tends to run slowly which can at times be frustrating for timely submissions. (Though, this could also be my machine rather than the system itself). Formats/guidelines can sometimes change with little warning and aren't always immediately reflected in training/reference materials. While not my experience, some of the editors seem to have dealt with significant frustrations from parent company demands and felt their feedback was ignored.

2.0
May 31, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Position allows free entrance to conventions like NYCC or SDCC as long as you report on them and direct contact with established industry names.

Cons

Low pay for the amount of work you do, unclear communication, very little stability behind the scenes. They will do their best to pay you as little as possible.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All