Pros
A lot of non-director colleagues are genuinely talented, supportive, and empathetic. Most stay here because of each other, not because of the company.
Clients are mostly great to work with and are the only bright spot in an otherwise chaotic environment.
Theoretical opportunities for training and career development look good on paper but rarely materialise.
Cons
Micromanagement beyond reason: Every email, message, and piece of client communication is dissected by directors. Employees are given zero trust or autonomy. Independence is viewed as insubordination.
Gaslighting as management style: Feedback and concerns are routinely dismissed. Directors contradict themselves, deny previous conversations, and blame everyone but themselves. Non-directors are constantly undermined and belittled.
Work–life imbalance: Holidays are guilt-tripped even after approval, you’re made to feel irresponsible for having a life outside work especially if a client has a running project. Boundaries don’t exist as only the directors’ convenience does.
Empty promises: Training, accreditation, and progression are repeatedly promised but delayed, deprioritised, or forgotten altogether. Employees are left to figure it out while being judged for not performing miracles. A promotion here is not in their interest.
Culture of fear and control: Directors make disrespectful remarks about offshore colleagues and try to put colleagues against each other, they thrive on an individuals disruption as that makes them weak. The culture changes daily depending on who’s in the room or what mood leadership is in.
Burnout and mental exhaustion: The environment is emotionally draining, psychologically manipulative, and unsustainable. Capable, confident professionals leave questioning their abilities and worth.
Dishonest exit handling: When people leave whether by choice or through “redundancy” leadership hides the truth, delays client communication, and rewrites narratives in attempt to protect themselves.
