Overworked, Underpaid, Unsafe conditions for RRTs and patients - Registered Respiratory Therapist (RRT) Atrium Health Employee Review

1.0
Jan 9, 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Experience a wide variety of healthcare conditions, diseases, traumas, and anomalies which will help with development and performance as a RRT.

Cons

Unsafe working conditions as far as heavy patient loads- a point system for determining assignments is not followed appropriately, underpaid for having to respond to every major rapid or code and management of the patient's airway, Atrium does not provide an incentive for high performer's, this year there is no pay increase for those the company believes already are paid fairly (including myself), as an Atrium employee you are required to use Atrium's insurance company and see Atrium providers for healthcare needs but the costs are steep. General poor culture within the workplace due to stress on employees of all the points I have already addressed.

Explore other reviews about Atrium Health

5.0
May 27, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good benefits, work life balance

Cons

have to use PTO for holidays

1
2.0
Jun 21, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I spent many years in outpatient rehabilitation and saw firsthand how much meaningful patient care can happen when clinicians are empowered. Earlier in my tenure, there were real opportunities for growth, mentorship and professional development. The team was collaborative and deeply committed to patients, and support staff worked hard under challenging circumstances. Those are strengths worth acknowledging.

Cons

As leadership changed, the culture around performance and advancement shifted. Over time I felt that institutional memory, specialty expertise and long‑term contributions were not valued consistently. Promotion practices seemed opaque, and I saw clinicians with substantially less experience and questionable communication acumen move into roles without clear explanations. Most importantly, I experienced increasing friction between high performers and leaders whose roles felt more performative than grounded in clinical or operational expertise. That tension appeared to be tolerated by the institution. Questions about decisions were discouraged, and requests for discussion went unanswered—even when they came from people with decades of service and a record of strong outcomes. After years of above‑average performance reviews, the feedback I received near the end of my tenure seemed inconsistent with my record and, in my view, hypocritical. This sudden shift in narrative felt like a mechanism to justify decisions already made rather than an honest assessment. For clinicians who invest deeply in their programs and relationships, contradictory or last‑minute feedback is demoralizing and undermines trust in the review process. Although department leaders appear to view themselves as emotionally intelligent, my experience was quite different: they delivered polished, stoic performances but did not exhibit the empathy, listening, or unbiased 360 assessment skills that clinicians need from leadership. That disconnect was another source of friction between high performers and management.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All