employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Animal Friends Insurance

Engaged employer

A supportive and friendly company - Customer Service Agent Animal Friends Insurance Employee Review

5.0
Oct 16, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I loved my time at AFI working in customer service. There is real a sense of community within the department (even when remote working), from a supportive and fun group chat, to regular light-hearted team breaks. Seniors are always approachable and are accommodating to agents’ working/personal needs - it’s very much an equal playing field.

Cons

Regarding workload, agents are encouraged to be trained in multiple areas of customer service, though personally, I don’t see this as a con. I enjoy a challenge, expanding on my skill set, and mixing up my days - otherwise I’d be bored.

Explore other reviews about Animal Friends Insurance

1.0
Jun 15, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Hours and Work from Home

Cons

Did not even stay long enough to finish my training. I could not believe the way they work. They want all agents to use abbreviation when making notes alongside their pet insurance Jargon, I knew I would find this impossible and cause many many problems if I could not understand agents previous notes. The abbreviations were not like the standard eg: Canx instead of cancellation but literally ALL WORDS...but again not to their set abbreviations to what you would have to learn but just abbreviations!!!. I am sorry but I was Educated to correct English Language and spelling so to try and understand notes abbreviated to 2/3 letters would be like learning a whole different language. If agents use their own made up abbreviations then how can anyone understand customer history and whats gone on. I would have had to put customers on hold to try and figure out internal notes. Mad.

2.0
May 2, 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible working, WFH/Remote upon request Team members at same level were generally supportive and helpful on a day-to-day basis. Opportunity to gain experience handling a high volume of calls and emails.

Cons

Poor and often inconsistent communication from management across the company. Limited career progression, with advancement not always appearing to be based on experience or performance. Consistently high workload, not just during peak periods as suggested by management. Lack of collaboration between departments, with teams operating in silos rather than working together. Very heavy micro-management, including strict monitoring of metrics such as emails per hour, call duration, hold time, and time spent on post-call notes. Hiring and promotion decisions sometimes appeared to be influenced by personal preference rather than merit. Policies around sickness, dependants leave, and emergency leave felt overly strict, with employees often scrutinised or penalised.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All